Display
- Amazfit GTR 3 Pro
- 480 × 480 pixels; 331 ppi
- Amazfit Active 2 Round
- 466 × 466 pixels; 353 ppi
Wearable comparison
Amazfit GTR 3 Pro vs Amazfit Active 2 Round
Compare battery life, health tracking, display and fit.
01Selected  Amazfit GTR 3 Pro
KSh 20,000Out of Stock | 02  Amazfit Active 2 Round
KSh 16,500In Stock |
|---|
Add to comparison
2 spaces available
Huawei Watch Fit 5KSh 18,500
Samsung Galaxy Watch FEKSh 19,500
Fitbit Charge 6KSh 20,000
AmazFit Active EdgeKSh 17,000
AmazFit BalanceKSh 22,000
Amazfit Active MaxKSh 24,000
Amazfit GTS 4KSh 18,500
2 of 4 products
Our quick verdict
The Amazfit GTR 3 Pro lasts longer between charges (12 days typical) and has a sturdier aluminium build, while the Amazfit Active 2 Round is lighter to wear all day.
Capacity
- Amazfit GTR 3 Pro
- 450 mAh battery capacity
- Amazfit Active 2 Round
- 270 mAh battery capacity
Portability
- Amazfit GTR 3 Pro
- 32 g
- Amazfit Active 2 Round
- 29.5 g
Software
- Amazfit GTR 3 Pro
- Zepp OS
- Amazfit Active 2 Round
- Zepp
Connections
- Amazfit GTR 3 Pro
- Bluetooth 5.0
- Amazfit Active 2 Round
- Bluetooth 5.2
Key differences
The main differences to help you choose.
Amazfit GTR 3 Pro
- Longer battery life: up to 12 days in typical use (vs 10).
- Longer sport-mode battery: up to 35 hours in GPS mode (vs 21 hours in GPS mode).
- Bigger battery: 450 mAh (vs 270 mAh).
- Aluminium case (vs plastic case).
- Slightly larger 1.45-inch screen (vs 1.32-inch).
Amazfit Active 2 Round
- Lighter: 29.5 g (vs 32 g).
- Slimmer: 9.9 mm thick (vs 10.7 mm).
- Newer Bluetooth 5.2 (vs 5.0).
What matters most to you?
6 priorities selected.
| Priority | Amazfit GTR 3 Pro | Amazfit Active 2 Round |
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | 450 mAh battery | 270 mAh battery |
| Portability | 32 g | 29.5 g |
| Display | 1.45-inch OLED display, 331 ppi | 1.32-inch OLED display, 353 ppi |
| Software | Zepp OS | Zepp |
| Connections | Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| Sensors | BioTracker 3.0 PPG, 6 PD + 2 LED | BioTracker PPG, accelerometer |
| Sleep tracking | Sleep stages including REM, naps | Sleep HRV, sleep stages including REM |
| Charging | Magnetic charging | Magnetic charging head |
| Positioning / GNSS | GPS, GLONASS | 5 satellite positioning systems, circularly polarized antenna |
| Health & wellness features | Heart rate, spO₂ | 24-hour heart rate, SpO₂ and stress |
| Third-party fitness apps | Adidas Running, strava | Strava, adidas Running |
| Controls / buttons | Two physical buttons including a rotating navigation crown, plus touchscreen | Two physical buttons and touchscreen |
| Wrist size | 155–218 mm | 135–195 mm |
| Strap / band | 22 mm leather or fluororubber | 20 mm quick-release silicone, pin buckle |
Tick a topic above to see how each product answers it.
Detailed comparison
Explore the full specifications, section by section.
These products have the same published specifications.
Similarities
- Both are water resistant to 50 m.
- Both take calls over Bluetooth.
- Both have OLED displays.
- Both have similar screen sizes (1.45 and 1.32 inches).
- Both connect over Bluetooth.
- Both recharge in about 2 hours.
In summary
For most buyers the Amazfit GTR 3 Pro is the better buy; the Amazfit Active 2 Round makes sense if you want a lighter watch for all-day wear.
Back to compared products ↑In-stock alternatives
Related comparisons
Amazfit GTR 3 ProHuawei Watch Fit 5Amazfit GTR 3 ProSamsung Galaxy Watch FEAmazfit GTR 3 ProFitbit Charge 6Amazfit GTR 3 ProAmazFit Active EdgeAmazfit GTR 3 ProAmazFit BalanceAmazfit GTR 3 ProAmazfit Active MaxAmazfit GTR 3 ProAmazfit GTS 4Amazfit GTR 3 Pro
Amazfit Active 2 Premium RoundAmazfit GTR 3 Pro
Amazfit Active 3 Premium