Skip to content

Charger comparison

Anker 736 Nano II 100W vs CMF Power 140W

Compare charging power, ports and device compatibility.

Compared products
01Selected
Anker 736 Nano II 100W Charger

Anker 736 Nano II 100W Charger

  • 100 W rated total output.
  • Supports GAN, PPS.
  • Wall socket mounting.
KSh 8,000In Stock
02
CMF Power 140W GaN Charger

CMF Power 140W GaN Charger

  • Supports GAN.
  • 140W.
  • Wall socket mounting.
KSh 9,000In Stock
2 of 4 products

Add to comparison

2 spaces available

UGREEN Uno 100W 4-Port GaN Charger UKKSh 8,700
OnePlus SUPERVOOC 150W Type-C AdapterKSh 8,000
Anker Charger 100W, 3 Ports, Smart DisplayKSh 9,750
Anker 140W 4-Port GaN Charger with USB-C CableKSh 8,330

Our quick verdict

Choose the Anker 736 Nano II 100W Charger if you want a lower price (KSh 1,000 less). Choose the CMF Power 140W GaN Charger if you want a higher 140 W rated output.

Charging

Anker 736 Nano II 100W Charger
Supports GAN, PPS
CMF Power 140W GaN Charger
Supports GAN

Output power

Anker 736 Nano II 100W Charger
100W total max
CMF Power 140W GaN Charger
140W

Key differences

The main differences to help you choose.

Anker 736 Nano II 100W Charger

  • Lower price: KSh 8,000 (KSh 1,000 less).

CMF Power 140W GaN Charger

  • Higher rated output: 140 W.

What matters most to you?

Choose any priorities

How each product answers the questions buyers ask most. Untick a topic to hide it.

3 priorities selected.

Anker 736 Nano II 100W Charger

  • 100W total max.
  • 3 output ports.
  • Supports PPS.

CMF Power 140W GaN Charger

  • 140W.
  • 3 output ports.
  • Supports GAN.

Detailed comparison

Explore the full specifications, section by section.

General

General specifications comparison
SpecificationAnker 736 Nano II 100W ChargerCMF Power 140W GaN Charger
BrandAnkerCMF

Charger

Charger specifications comparison
SpecificationAnker 736 Nano II 100W ChargerCMF Power 140W GaN Charger
Brand / ModelAnker 736 Charger (Nano II 100W) · A2145CMF GaN Charger
Charger TypeGaN Wall ChargerGaN Wall Charger
Colour / DesignBlack · compact GaN IIDark Grey

Power & Charging

Power & Charging specifications comparison
SpecificationAnker 736 Nano II 100W ChargerCMF Power 140W GaN Charger
Maximum Output100W total max; three-port mode 93W max—
Input100–240V AC · 2.1A · 50/60Hz—
Charging TechnologyGaN II · PowerIQ 3.0 · PPSGaN
Ports / Charging Positions2× USB-C outputs + 1× USB-A output2× USB-C outputs + 1× USB-A output pictured
Output / Power DistributionC1/C2: 5V⎓3A / 9V⎓3A / 15V⎓3A / 20V⎓5A (100W); PPS 3.3–16V⎓5A (80W). A: 4.5V⎓5A / 5V⎓4.5A / 5V⎓3A / 9V⎓2A / 12V⎓1.5A (22.5W). C1+C2: 60W+40W; C1+A: 80W+18W; C2+A: 60W+22.5W; all ports: 45W+30W+18W—

Design & Features

Design & Features specifications comparison
SpecificationAnker 736 Nano II 100W ChargerCMF Power 140W GaN Charger
Design / MountingWall socket mountingWall socket mounting
Cooling / SafetyAnker temperature and power monitoring protection—

Compatibility & Physical

Compatibility & Physical specifications comparison
SpecificationAnker 736 Nano II 100W ChargerCMF Power 140W GaN Charger
Compatibility / NotesUSB-C laptops, phones and tablets; 100W requires a suitable 5A E-Marker cable—
Dimensions / Weight / PackageIn the box: charger and user guide; cable sold separately—

Similarities

  • Both use GaN technology.
  • Both are wall chargers.
  • Same design / mounting: wall socket mounting.

In summary

Choose CMF 140W for more total output; Anker 736 Nano II 100W is the cheaper choice when you do not need the extra output.

Back to compared products ↑

Related comparisons

Back to Top

My Cart