Charging
- Anker 736 Nano II 100W Charger
- Supports GAN, PPS
- Motorola TurboPower 68W Wall Charger
- Supports GAN
Charger comparison
Anker 736 Nano II 100W vs Motorola TurboPower 68W Wall
Compare charging power, ports and device compatibility.
01Selected  Anker 736 Nano II 100W Charger
KSh 8,000In Stock | 02  Motorola TurboPower 68W Wall Charger
KSh 6,500In Stock |
|---|
Add to comparison
2 spaces available
OnePlus SUPERVOOC 150W Type-C AdapterKSh 8,000
Anker Charger 100W, 3 Ports, Smart DisplayKSh 9,750
Anker 140W 4-Port GaN Charger with USB-C CableKSh 8,330
Anker Prime Charger 100W, 3 Ports, GaNKSh 9,010
Apple Dual Usb-C 35w Power AdapterKSh 7,500
CMF Power 100W GaN ChargerKSh 7,500
CMF by Nothing 65W Power ChargerKSh 7,300
2 of 4 products
Our quick verdict
The Anker 736 Nano II 100W Charger has 3 charging ports, while the Motorola TurboPower 68W Wall Charger costs KSh 1,500 less.
Output power
- Anker 736 Nano II 100W Charger
- 100W total max
- Motorola TurboPower 68W Wall Charger
- 68 W rated output
Ports
- Anker 736 Nano II 100W Charger
- 3 output ports
- Motorola TurboPower 68W Wall Charger
- 1 output port
Cooling / safety
- Anker 736 Nano II 100W Charger
- Anker temperature and power monitoring protection
- Motorola TurboPower 68W Wall Charger
- TurboPower Shield protection against overheating and voltage faults
Key differences
The main differences to help you choose.
Anker 736 Nano II 100W Charger
- More ports: 3 (vs 1).
- Supports PPS.
Motorola TurboPower 68W Wall Charger
- Lower price: KSh 6,500 (vs KSh 8,000).
- Supports USB PD.
What matters most to you?
4 priorities selected.
| Priority | Anker 736 Nano II 100W Charger | Motorola TurboPower 68W Wall Charger |
|---|---|---|
| Output power | 100W total max | 68 W rated output |
| Ports | 3 output ports | 1 output port |
| Charging support | Supports PPS | Supports USB PD |
| Cooling / safety | Anker temperature and power monitoring protection | TurboPower Shield protection against overheating and voltage faults |
Tick a topic above to see how each product answers it.
Detailed comparison
Explore the full specifications, section by section.
These products have the same published specifications.
Similarities
- Both use GaN technology.
- Both are wall chargers.
- Both go up to 240 V (input).
- Same design / mounting: wall socket mounting.
In summary
For most buyers the Anker 736 Nano II 100W Charger is the better buy; the Motorola TurboPower 68W Wall Charger makes sense if price matters most, as it costs less.
Back to compared products ↑In-stock alternatives
For Anker 736 Nano II 100W ChargerCMF Power 100W GaN ChargerView product ↗For Anker 736 Nano II 100W ChargerAnker 140W 4-Port GaN Charger with USB-C CableView product ↗For Motorola TurboPower 68W Wall ChargerCMF by Nothing 65W Power ChargerView product ↗
For Motorola TurboPower 68W Wall ChargerApple 40W Dynamic Power Adapter with 60W MaxView product ↗Related comparisons
Anker 736 Nano II 100W ChargerOnePlus SUPERVOOC 150W Type-C AdapterAnker 736 Nano II 100W ChargerAnker Charger 100W, 3 Ports, Smart DisplayAnker 736 Nano II 100W ChargerAnker 140W 4-Port GaN Charger with USB-C CableAnker 736 Nano II 100W ChargerAnker Prime Charger 100W, 3 Ports, GaNAnker 736 Nano II 100W ChargerApple Dual Usb-C 35w Power AdapterAnker 736 Nano II 100W ChargerCMF Power 100W GaN ChargerAnker 736 Nano II 100W ChargerCMF by Nothing 65W Power ChargerAnker 736 Nano II 100W Charger
Samsung 25W Qi2 Magnetic Wireless ChargerAnker 736 Nano II 100W Charger
UGREEN Nexode Pro GaN Charger 100W with Retractable USB-C Cable