Skip to content

Charger comparison

Anker 735 GaNPrime vs Anker Prime 250W GaN Desktop 6 Ports

Compare charging power, ports and device compatibility.

Compared products
01Selected
Anker 735 GaNPrime 65W Charger

Anker 735 GaNPrime 65W Charger

  • 65 W rated total output.
  • Supports PPS.
KSh 12,000In Stock
02
Anker Prime 250W GaN Desktop Charger 6 Ports

Anker Prime 250W GaN Desktop Charger 6 Ports

  • About 640 g.
  • 250 W rated output.
  • Charging technology: gaNPrime, PowerIQ 4.0 and ActiveShield 3.0.
  • Screen: 2.26-inch LCD and control dial.
  • Connector: mains power cord input.
KSh 20,670In Stock

Add to comparison

2 spaces available

Apple 35W Dual USB Type-C Port Power AdapterKSh 10,500
Dual Battery Charger for HERO13 BlackKSh 16,500
Apple USB-C 70W Power AdapterKSh 14,500
UGREEN Nexode Charger 6-Port 200WKSh 11,500
Anker Charger 100W, 3 Ports, Smart DisplayKSh 9,750
Anker 140W 4-Port GaN Charger with USB-C CableKSh 8,330
Anker Prime Charger 100W, 3 Ports, GaNKSh 9,010
2 of 4 products

Our quick verdict

Choose the Anker 735 GaNPrime 65W Charger if you want a GaN design and a much lower price (KSh 8,670 less). Choose the Anker Prime 250W GaN Desktop Charger 6 Ports if you want 6 charging ports.

This comparison is partial: only 4 of the 15 specifications are published for both products. The Anker 735 GaNPrime 65W Charger does not list Compatible Model, connector or dimensions; the Anker Prime 250W GaN Desktop Charger 6 Ports does not list Charger Type, output / Power Distribution or Smart Features.

Output power

Anker 735 GaNPrime 65W Charger
65W total max
Anker Prime 250W GaN Desktop Charger 6 Ports
250 W rated output

Ports

Anker 735 GaNPrime 65W Charger
3 output ports
Anker Prime 250W GaN Desktop Charger 6 Ports
6 output ports

Charging

Anker 735 GaNPrime 65W Charger
Supports PPS
Anker Prime 250W GaN Desktop Charger 6 Ports
GaNPrime, PowerIQ 4.0 and ActiveShield 3.0

Key differences

The main differences to help you choose.

Anker 735 GaNPrime 65W Charger

  • GaN charger design.
  • Lower price: KSh 12,000 (vs KSh 20,670).

Anker Prime 250W GaN Desktop Charger 6 Ports

  • More ports: 6 (vs 3).

What matters most to you?

Choose any priorities

How each product answers the questions buyers ask most. Tick a topic to add it, untick one to hide it.

3 priorities selected.
How each product answers the selected priorities
PriorityAnker 735 GaNPrime 65W ChargerAnker Prime 250W GaN Desktop Charger 6 Ports
Output power65W total max250 W rated output
Ports3 output ports6 output ports
ChargingSupports PPSGaNPrime, PowerIQ 4.0 and ActiveShield 3.0

Detailed comparison

Explore the full specifications, section by section.

General

General specifications comparison
SpecificationAnker 735 GaNPrime 65W ChargerAnker Prime 250W GaN Desktop Charger 6 Ports
BrandAnkerAnker
Model—A2345241

Design

Design specifications comparison
SpecificationAnker 735 GaNPrime 65W ChargerAnker Prime 250W GaN Desktop Charger 6 Ports
Dimensions—106.2 × 40.2 × 92.5mm
Weight—Approximately 640g

Charger

Charger specifications comparison
SpecificationAnker 735 GaNPrime 65W ChargerAnker Prime 250W GaN Desktop Charger 6 Ports
Brand / ModelAnker 735 Charger (GaNPrime 65W) · A2668Anker; A2345241
Charger TypeGaN Wall Charger—

Power & Charging

Power & Charging specifications comparison
SpecificationAnker 735 GaNPrime 65W ChargerAnker Prime 250W GaN Desktop Charger 6 Ports
Maximum Output65W total max250W under supported multi-device arrangements
Input100–240V AC · 1.8A · 50/60Hz100–240V AC, 3.5A, 50–60Hz
Charging TechnologyGaNPrime · PowerIQ 4.0 · PPSGaNPrime, PowerIQ 4.0 and ActiveShield 3.0
Ports / Charging Positions2× USB-C outputs + 1× USB-A output4 USB-C and 2 USB-A
Output / Power DistributionC1/C2: 5V⎓3A / 9V⎓3A / 15V⎓3A / 20V⎓3.25A (65W). A: 4.5V⎓5A / 5V⎓4.5A / 5V⎓3A / 9V⎓2A / 12V⎓1.5A (22.5W). C1+C2 or C1+A: 65W shared dynamically; C2+A: 24W shared. All ports: 65W shared—

Design & Features

Design & Features specifications comparison
SpecificationAnker 735 GaNPrime 65W ChargerAnker Prime 250W GaN Desktop Charger 6 Ports
Smart FeaturesDynamic Power Distribution with PowerIQ 4.0—
Cooling / SafetyActiveShield temperature monitoring—

Compatibility & Physical

Compatibility & Physical specifications comparison
SpecificationAnker 735 GaNPrime 65W ChargerAnker Prime 250W GaN Desktop Charger 6 Ports
Compatibility / NotesCompatible USB-C PD devices; charging speed depends on the device and cable—
Dimensions / Weight / PackageIn the box: charger and documentation; charging cable sold separately—

Additional specifications

Additional specifications specifications comparison
SpecificationAnker 735 GaNPrime 65W ChargerAnker Prime 250W GaN Desktop Charger 6 Ports
Compatible Model—Compatible USB-C laptops, tablets, phones and USB-A accessories; power depends on charging mode, protocol and cable
Colour—Silver
Connector—Mains power cord input; 4 USB-C outputs and 2 USB-A outputs
Power—250W shared maximum; USB-C1 up to 140W individually; USB-C2/C3/C4 up to 100W individually; USB-A up to 22.5W per port individually

Product details

Product details specifications comparison
SpecificationAnker 735 GaNPrime 65W ChargerAnker Prime 250W GaN Desktop Charger 6 Ports
USB-C1—Up to 140W with compatible device/cable
USB-C2, C3 and C4—Up to 100W each individually
USB-A—Up to 22.5W per port individually
Screen—2.26-inch LCD and control dial; clock view
Charging modes—AI Power, Port Priority, Dual-Laptop and Low-Current
Connectivity—Bluetooth setup and 2.4GHz Wi-Fi; 5GHz Wi-Fi unsupported
Dimensions and weight—106.2 × 40.2 × 92.5mm; approximately 640g
Two active ports—Up to 240W combined; allocation depends on arrangement
Three to six ports—Up to 250W combined; allocation depends on arrangement
App—Supported controls, statistics and firmware updates; refresh delay can occur
Package connection—Compatible mains power cord; USB charging cables and devices supplied separately

Similarities

  • Both go up to 240 V (input).
  • Both are made by Anker.

In summary

Choose Anker Prime 250W 6 for six charging ports; Anker 735 GaNPrime 65W offers a GaN design at a price about 42% lower.

Back to compared products ↑

Related comparisons

Back to Top

My Cart