Display
- OnePlus Nord Watch
- 368 × 448 pixels; 326 ppi
- AmazFit Active
- 390 × 450 pixels; 341 ppi
Wearable comparison
OnePlus Nord vs AmazFit Active
Compare battery life, health tracking, display and fit.
01Selected  OnePlus Nord Watch
KSh 11,000In Stock | 02  AmazFit Active
KSh 12,500Out of Stock |
|---|
Add to comparison
2 spaces available
Oraimo Watch ES OSW-41KSh 10,500
CMF Watch 3 ProKSh 11,500
Samsung Galaxy Fit 3KSh 9,000
Redmi Watch 3KSh 10,500
Redmi Watch 6KSh 10,000
Huawei Band 11KSh 9,500
Huawei Band 11 ProKSh 11,500
2 of 4 products
Our quick verdict
The AmazFit Active is the better buy: it lasts longer between charges (14 days typical), gives daily readiness scores and is lighter to wear all day.
Software
- OnePlus Nord Watch
- Runs Proprietary OS
- AmazFit Active
- Runs Zepp OS 4
Capacity
- OnePlus Nord Watch
- 230 mAh battery capacity
- AmazFit Active
- 300 mAh battery capacity
Portability
- OnePlus Nord Watch
- 52.4 g
- AmazFit Active
- 35.7 g
Storage
- OnePlus Nord Watch
- 256 Mb
- AmazFit Active
- Up to 250 MB music storage
Key differences
The main differences to help you choose.
OnePlus Nord Watch
- 1.78-inch OLED display, 60 Hz, 326 ppi.
- 256 Mb.
- 230 mAh battery.
- IP68 water and dust resistance.
AmazFit Active
- Longer battery life: up to 14 days in typical use (vs 10).
- Bigger battery: 300 mAh (vs 230 mAh).
- Lighter: 35.7 g (vs 52.4 g).
- Daily readiness scores.
- Syncs with third-party apps such as Strava and Apple Health.
What matters most to you?
6 priorities selected.
| Priority | OnePlus Nord Watch | AmazFit Active |
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | 230 mAh battery | 300 mAh battery |
| Portability | 52.4 g | 35.7 g |
| Storage | 256 Mb | Up to 250 MB music storage |
| Display | 1.78-inch OLED display, 60 Hz, 326 ppi | 1.75-inch OLED display, 341 ppi |
| Software | Proprietary OS | Zepp OS 4 |
| Connections | Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| Water resistance | IP68 water and dust resistance | 5 ATM |
| Sensors | 3-axis accelerometer, optical heart-rate and blood-oxygen sensors | BioTracker PPG, accelerometer |
| Sleep tracking | Sleep-cycle tracking | Sleep stages including REM, naps |
| Health & wellness features | 24-hour heart rate, spO₂ | 24-hour heart rate, SpO₂ and stress |
| Smart recognition | Automatic running and walking tracking | 7 sports movements |
| Controls / buttons | Side button and touchscreen | 1 button, touchscreen |
| Wrist size | Configuration dependent | Silicone: 135–190 mm, vegan leather: 135–200 mm |
| Strap / band | Silicone, stainless-steel buckle | 20 mm silicone or vegan leather |
| Case material | Zinc alloy | Aluminum alloy or stainless steel |
Tick a topic above to see how each product answers it.
Detailed comparison
Explore the full specifications, section by section.
These products have the same published specifications.
Similarities
- Both use Bluetooth 5.2.
- Both have OLED displays.
- Both have similar screen sizes (1.78 and 1.75 inches).
- Both connect over Bluetooth.
- Both use 24-hour (health & wellness features).
- Same charging: magnetic charging.
In summary
The AmazFit Active is the better buy for almost everyone, with longer battery life and daily readiness scores.
Back to compared products ↑
Xiaomi Smart Band 10 Ceramic Edition