Display
- CMF Watch Pro
- 410 × 502 pixels; 332 ppi
- AmazFit Pop 3s
- 410 × 502 pixels; 330 ppi
Wearable comparison
CMF Watch Pro vs AmazFit Pop 3s
Compare battery life, health tracking, display and fit.
01Selected  CMF Watch Pro
KSh 8,500In Stock | 02  AmazFit Pop 3s
KSh 7,500In Stock |
|---|
Add to comparison
2 spaces available
Oraimo Watch Nova Pro AMKSh 8,000
Samsung Galaxy Fit 3KSh 9,000
CMF Watch Pro 2KSh 8,000
Huawei Band 9KSh 8,000
Redmi Watch 5 LiteKSh 8,880
Redmi Watch 6KSh 10,000
CMF Watch 3 ProKSh 11,500
2 of 4 products
Our quick verdict
With the same 1.96-inch OLED screen and IP68 rating, the CMF Watch Pro has a bigger battery (340 mAh), is lighter to wear all day and has a brighter screen for outdoor use, while the AmazFit Pop 3s is slimmer.
Capacity
- CMF Watch Pro
- 340 mAh battery capacity
- AmazFit Pop 3s
- 300 mAh battery capacity
Portability
- CMF Watch Pro
- 31.1 g
- AmazFit Pop 3s
- 35.6 g
Connections
- CMF Watch Pro
- Bluetooth 5.3
- AmazFit Pop 3s
- Bluetooth 5.2
Sensors
- CMF Watch Pro
- Accelerometer, optical heart-rate and SpO₂ sensor
- AmazFit Pop 3s
- Optical heart-rate and blood-oxygen sensor
Key differences
The main differences to help you choose.
CMF Watch Pro
- Bigger battery: 340 mAh (vs 300 mAh).
- Brighter display: up to 600 nits (vs 400).
- Lighter: 31.1 g (vs 35.6 g).
- Aluminium case (vs plastic case).
- Built-in GPS (the other uses the phone's GPS).
- Charging: Proprietary magnetic charging cable.
AmazFit Pop 3s
- Slimmer: 10.4 mm thick (vs 11.4 mm).
- Lower price: KSh 7,500 (vs KSh 8,500).
- Charging: Magnetic contact charging.
What matters most to you?
6 priorities selected.
| Priority | CMF Watch Pro | AmazFit Pop 3s |
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | 340 mAh battery | 300 mAh battery |
| Portability | 31.1 g | 35.6 g |
| Display | 1.96-inch OLED display, 332 ppi | 1.96-inch OLED display, 330 ppi |
| Connections | Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| Water resistance | IP68 water and dust resistance | IP68 water and dust resistance |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, optical heart-rate and SpO₂ sensor | Optical heart-rate and blood-oxygen sensor |
| Sleep tracking | Sleep tracking | Deep and light sleep, awake time |
| Charging | Proprietary magnetic charging cable | Magnetic contact charging |
| Companion app | CMF Watch | Zepp Active |
| Peak brightness | 600 nits typical | 400 nits |
| Speaker | Built-in speaker | Supported |
| Controls / buttons | Side function button and full touchscreen | 1 button, touchscreen |
| Strap / band | Removable silicone strap | Silicone |
| Pixels per inch | 332 ppi | 330 ppi |
Tick a topic above to see how each product answers it.
Detailed comparison
Explore the full specifications, section by section.
These products have the same published specifications.
Similarities
- Both take calls over Bluetooth.
- Both have OLED displays.
- Both have 1.96-inch screens.
- Both connect over Bluetooth.
- Both use 24-hour (health & wellness features).
- Same calling: Bluetooth calling.
In summary
For most buyers the CMF Watch Pro is the better buy; the AmazFit Pop 3s makes sense if you want a slimmer build.
Back to compared products ↑
Huawei Band 11
Xiaomi Smart Band 10