Display
- CMF Watch Pro 2
- 466 × 466 pixels; 353 ppi
- AmazFit Pop 3R
- 466 × 466 pixels; 326 ppi
Wearable comparison
CMF Watch Pro 2 vs AmazFit Pop 3R
Compare battery life, health tracking, display and fit.
01Selected  CMF Watch Pro 2
KSh 8,000In Stock | 02  AmazFit Pop 3R
KSh 6,700In Stock |
|---|
Add to comparison
2 spaces available
Huawei Band 11 ProKSh 11,500
CMF Watch 3 ProKSh 11,500
Samsung Galaxy Fit 3KSh 8,500
Oraimo Watch Nova Pro AMKSh 8,000
AmazFit Pop 3sKSh 7,500
CMF Watch ProKSh 8,500
Huawei Band 9KSh 8,000
2 of 4 products
Our quick verdict
The CMF Watch Pro 2 has a brighter screen for outdoor use, a sturdier aluminium build and built-in GPS for runs without your phone, while the AmazFit Pop 3R is lighter to wear all day.
Capacity
- CMF Watch Pro 2
- 305 mAh battery capacity
- AmazFit Pop 3R
- 320 mAh battery capacity
Portability
- CMF Watch Pro 2
- 44.4 g
- AmazFit Pop 3R
- 37.04 g
Connections
- CMF Watch Pro 2
- Bluetooth 5.3
- AmazFit Pop 3R
- Bluetooth 5.2
Sensors
- CMF Watch Pro 2
- Accelerometer, optical heart-rate and SpO₂ sensor
- AmazFit Pop 3R
- Optical heart-rate and blood-oxygen sensor
Key differences
The main differences to help you choose.
CMF Watch Pro 2
- Brighter display: up to 620 nits (vs 400).
- Aluminium case (vs plastic case).
- Built-in GPS (the other uses the phone's GPS).
- Charging: Proprietary charging cable.
AmazFit Pop 3R
- Lighter: 37.04 g (vs 44.4 g).
- Slimmer: 10.8 mm thick (vs 13.6 mm).
- Lower price: KSh 6,700 (vs KSh 8,000).
- Charging: Magnetic contact charging.
What matters most to you?
6 priorities selected.
| Priority | CMF Watch Pro 2 | AmazFit Pop 3R |
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | 305 mAh battery | 320 mAh battery |
| Portability | 44.4 g | 37.04 g |
| Display | 1.32-inch OLED display, 353 ppi | 1.43-inch OLED display, 326 ppi |
| Connections | Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| Water resistance | IP68 water and dust resistance | IP68 water and dust resistance |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, optical heart-rate and SpO₂ sensor | Optical heart-rate and blood-oxygen sensor |
| Sleep tracking | Smart Sleep tracking | Deep and light sleep, awake time |
| Charging | Proprietary charging cable, approximately 100 minutes | Magnetic contact charging |
| Companion app | CMF Watch | Zepp Active |
| Peak brightness | 620 nits typical | 400 nits |
| Speaker | Built-in speaker | Supported |
| Health & wellness features | 24-hour heart rate, resting and exercise heart rate | 24-hour heart rate, spO₂ |
| Controls / buttons | Functional crown and touchscreen | 2 buttons, touchscreen |
| Strap / band | Liquid silicone on Dark/Ash Grey | Silicone |
Tick a topic above to see how each product answers it.
Detailed comparison
Explore the full specifications, section by section.
These products have the same published specifications.
Similarities
- Both take calls over Bluetooth.
- Both have OLED displays.
- Both have similar screen sizes (1.32 and 1.43 inches).
- Both connect over Bluetooth.
- Both use 24-hour (health & wellness features).
- Same calling: Bluetooth calling.
In summary
For most buyers the CMF Watch Pro 2 is the better buy; the AmazFit Pop 3R makes sense if you want a lighter watch for all-day wear.
Back to compared products ↑In-stock alternatives
Related comparisons
CMF Watch Pro 2Huawei Band 11 ProCMF Watch Pro 2CMF Watch 3 ProSamsung Galaxy Fit 3CMF Watch Pro 2CMF Watch Pro 2Oraimo Watch Nova Pro AMAmazFit Pop 3sCMF Watch Pro 2CMF Watch ProCMF Watch Pro 2CMF Watch Pro 2Huawei Band 9CMF Watch Pro 2
Redmi Watch 5 LiteCMF Watch Pro 2
Xiaomi Smart Band 10CMF Watch Pro 2
Samsung Galaxy Fit 4