Display
- Xiaomi Watch S1 Active
- 466 × 466 pixels
- Amazfit GTS 4
- 390 × 450 pixels; 341 ppi
Wearable comparison
Xiaomi Watch S1 vs Amazfit GTS 4
Compare battery life, health tracking, display and fit.
01Selected  Xiaomi Watch S1 Active
KSh 16,000In Stock | 02  Amazfit GTS 4
KSh 18,500Out of Stock |
|---|
Add to comparison
2 spaces available
Huawei Watch Fit 5KSh 18,500
Fitbit Inspire 3KSh 14,000
AmazFit Active EdgeKSh 17,000
Amazfit Bip 6KSh 14,500
Amazfit Active 2 RoundKSh 16,500
Huawei Watch Fit 4KSh 15,500
Redmi Watch 5KSh 15,680
2 of 4 products
Our quick verdict
The Amazfit GTS 4 is lighter to wear all day and has a larger 1.75-inch screen and a sturdier aluminium build, while the Xiaomi Watch S1 Active lasts longer between charges (12 days typical) and has a sharper screen.
Software
- Xiaomi Watch S1 Active
- Runs Proprietary OS
- Amazfit GTS 4
- Runs Zepp OS 2.0
Capacity
- Xiaomi Watch S1 Active
- 470 mAh battery capacity
- Amazfit GTS 4
- 300 mAh battery capacity
Portability
- Xiaomi Watch S1 Active
- 36 g
- Amazfit GTS 4
- 27 g
Connections
- Xiaomi Watch S1 Active
- Wi-Fi 4, Bluetooth 5.2
- Amazfit GTS 4
- Bluetooth 5.0
Key differences
The main differences to help you choose.
Xiaomi Watch S1 Active
- Longer battery life: up to 12 days in typical use (vs 8).
- Bigger battery: 470 mAh (vs 300 mAh).
- Higher screen resolution: 466 × 466 (vs 390 × 450).
- Newer Bluetooth 5.2 (vs 5.0).
Amazfit GTS 4
- Larger 1.75-inch screen (vs 1.43-inch).
- Lighter: 27 g (vs 36 g).
- Aluminium case (vs plastic case).
- Slimmer: 9.9 mm thick (vs 11 mm).
- Syncs with third-party apps such as Strava and Apple Health.
What matters most to you?
6 priorities selected.
| Priority | Xiaomi Watch S1 Active | Amazfit GTS 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | 470 mAh battery | 300 mAh battery |
| Portability | 36 g | 27 g |
| Display | 1.43-inch OLED display | 1.75-inch OLED display, 341 ppi |
| Software | Proprietary OS | Zepp OS 2.0 |
| Connections | Wi-Fi 4, Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| Sensors | Heart-rate and blood-oxygen sensor, accelerometer | BioTracker 4.0 PPG, 4 PD + 2 LED |
| Sleep tracking | Night sleep and supported naps | Sleep stages including REM, naps |
| Charging | Magnetic charging cable | Magnetic charging |
| Positioning / GNSS | GPS, GLONASS | Dual-band GNSS, 6 satellite positioning systems |
| Health & wellness features | Heart rate, blood oxygen, stress and supported cycle tracking | 24-hour heart rate, SpO₂ and stress |
| Controls / buttons | Touchscreen and side buttons | Navigation crown, touchscreen |
| Wrist size | 160–220 mm | 140–200 mm |
| Strap / band | White silicone, black or blue TPU | 20 mm quick-release fluororubber, pin buckle |
| Calling | Bluetooth calling through a connected compatible smartphone | Bluetooth calling |
Tick a topic above to see how each product answers it.
Detailed comparison
Explore the full specifications, section by section.
These products have the same published specifications.
Similarities
- Both are water resistant to 50 m.
- Both take calls over Bluetooth.
- Both have OLED displays.
- Both connect over Bluetooth.
- Both use 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi only.
In summary
For most buyers the Amazfit GTS 4 is the better buy; the Xiaomi Watch S1 Active makes sense if you want longer battery life.
Back to compared products ↑In-stock alternatives
Related comparisons
Xiaomi Watch S1 ActiveHuawei Watch Fit 5Xiaomi Watch S1 ActiveFitbit Inspire 3AmazFit Active EdgeXiaomi Watch S1 ActiveXiaomi Watch S1 ActiveAmazfit Bip 6Xiaomi Watch S1 ActiveAmazfit Active 2 RoundXiaomi Watch S1 ActiveHuawei Watch Fit 4Xiaomi Watch S1 ActiveRedmi Watch 5Xiaomi Watch S1 Active
Xiaomi Watch S3