Battery life
- Google Fitbit Air
- Up to 7 days
- Amazfit Active 2 Premium Round
- 270 mAh battery
Wearable comparison
Google Fitbit Air vs Amazfit Active 2 Premium Round
Compare battery life, health tracking, display and fit.
01Selected  Google Fitbit Air
KSh 20,000In Stock | 02  Amazfit Active 2 Premium Round
KSh 22,000In Stock |
|---|
Add to comparison
2 spaces available
Huawei Watch GT 5KSh 21,500
Amazfit Helio StrapKSh 22,000
Fitbit Charge 6KSh 20,000
Huawei Watch Fit 4 ProKSh 21,500
Amazfit GTR 3 ProKSh 20,000
Apple Watch Series 8KSh 50,000
Apple Watch SE 2KSh 28,500
2 of 4 products
Our quick verdict
The Google Fitbit Air, a screenless tracker you read in the Google Health app, is lighter to wear all day and has faster recharging (1.5 hours), while the Amazfit Active 2 Premium Round, a smartwatch with a 1.32-inch OLED screen, lasts longer between charges (up to 10 days), syncs with apps such as Strava and takes calls from the wrist.
Portability
- Google Fitbit Air
- 12 g
- Amazfit Active 2 Premium Round
- 31.65 g
Display
- Google Fitbit Air
- Screenless tracker
- Amazfit Active 2 Premium Round
- 1.32-inch OLED display, 353 ppi
Software
- Google Fitbit Air
- Google Health
- Amazfit Active 2 Premium Round
- Zepp OS
Connections
- Google Fitbit Air
- Bluetooth 5.0
- Amazfit Active 2 Premium Round
- Bluetooth 5.2
Key differences
The main differences to help you choose.
Google Fitbit Air
- Lighter: 12 g (vs 31.65 g).
- Screenless: worn day and night, with results read in the Google Health app.
- Recharges faster: 1.5 hours (vs 2 hours).
- Slimmer: 8.3 mm thick (vs 9.9 mm).
- Lower price: KSh 20,000 (vs KSh 22,000).
Amazfit Active 2 Premium Round
- Longer rated battery life: up to 10 days (vs 7 days).
- Screen on the wrist for the time, notifications and workout stats.
- Syncs with third-party apps such as Strava and Apple Health.
- Newer Bluetooth 5.2 (vs 5.0).
What matters most to you?
6 priorities selected.
| Priority | Google Fitbit Air | Amazfit Active 2 Premium Round |
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Up to 7 days | 270 mAh battery |
| Portability | 12 g | 31.65 g |
| Display | Screenless tracker | 1.32-inch OLED display, 353 ppi |
| Software | Google Health | Zepp OS |
| Connections | Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| Water resistance | Water resistant to 50 m | 5 ATM |
| Sensors | Optical heart-rate sensor, red and infrared SpO₂ sensors | BioTracker PPG, accelerometer |
| Sleep tracking | Sleep stages, sleep score | Sleep HRV, sleep stages including REM |
| Charging | USB-C charging cable | Magnetic charging head |
| Health & wellness features | Heart rate, blood oxygen | 24-hour heart rate, SpO₂ and stress |
| Controls / buttons | Screenless tracker with vibration feedback and an LED status light | Two physical buttons and touchscreen |
| Wrist size | Textile: 130–210 mm, silicone small: 130–175 mm | 150–210 mm |
| Strap / band | Textile band with stainless-steel buckle | 20 mm quick-release leather, pin buckle |
| Packing list | Tracker, wristband | Watch with standard strap, magnetic charging head |
Tick a topic above to see how each product answers it.
Detailed comparison
Explore the full specifications, section by section.
These products have the same published specifications.
Similarities
- Both have a plastic case.
- Both are water resistant to 50 m.
- Both connect over Bluetooth.
- Both go up to 210 mm (wrist size).
In summary
Get the Google Fitbit Air if you want a screenless tracker with faster recharging, or the Amazfit Active 2 Premium Round if you would rather have longer battery life and the time, notifications and workout stats on your wrist.
Back to compared products ↑
