Battery life
- AmazFit Falcon
- 500 mAh battery
- WHOOP Life
- Up to 14+ days
Wearable comparison
AmazFit Falcon vs WHOOP Life
Compare battery life, health tracking, display and fit.
01Selected  AmazFit Falcon
KSh 63,000Out of Stock | 02  WHOOP Life
KSh 55,500In Stock |
|---|
Add to comparison
2 spaces available
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 47mmKSh 62,000
Apple Watch Series 12 42mmKSh 64,000
Google Pixel Watch 5 45mmKSh 64,000
Apple Watch Series 12 46mmKSh 70,000
Amazfit T-Rex 3 ProKSh 55,000
Amazfit Balance 3KSh 48,000
Huawei Watch D3KSh 75,000
2 of 4 products
Our quick verdict
The WHOOP Life, a screenless tracker you read in the WHOOP app, takes ECG heart-rhythm readings, gives daily recovery and strain scores and is lighter to wear all day, though it needs a WHOOP membership, while the AmazFit Falcon, a smartwatch with a 1.28-inch OLED screen, is swimproof to 200 m.
Portability
- AmazFit Falcon
- 64 g
- WHOOP Life
- About 27.3 g
Display
- AmazFit Falcon
- 1.28-inch OLED display, 326 ppi
- WHOOP Life
- Screenless tracker
Software
- AmazFit Falcon
- Zepp OS
- WHOOP Life
- WHOOP with Life membership
Connections
- AmazFit Falcon
- Bluetooth 5.0
- WHOOP Life
- Bluetooth
Key differences
The main differences to help you choose.
AmazFit Falcon
- Screen on the wrist for the time, notifications and workout stats.
- Swimproof: water resistant to 200 m (vs 10 m).
- Charging: Magnetic charging.
WHOOP Life
- Lighter: about 27.3 g (vs 64 g).
- Screenless: worn day and night, with results read in the WHOOP app.
- ECG heart-rhythm readings.
- Daily recovery and strain scores.
- Slimmer: 10.6 mm thick (vs 12.95 mm).
- Charging: Wireless PowerPack.
What matters most to you?
6 priorities selected.
| Priority | AmazFit Falcon | WHOOP Life |
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | 500 mAh battery | Up to 14+ days |
| Portability | 64 g | About 27.3 g |
| Display | 1.28-inch OLED display, 326 ppi | Screenless tracker |
| Software | Zepp OS | WHOOP with Life membership |
| Connections | Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| Water resistance | 20 ATM | IP68 water and dust resistance |
| Sensors | BioTracker PPG biometric sensor with SpO₂ | PPG heart-rate sensor, accelerometer |
| Sleep tracking | Sleep stages including REM, daytime naps | Light, REM and deep sleep |
| Charging | Magnetic charging, approximately 2 hours | Wireless PowerPack, compatible with USB-C Basic Charger |
| Positioning / GNSS | Dual-band positioning with six satellite systems | Connected smartphone GPS, no built-in GPS |
| Health & wellness features | 24-hour heart-rate, blood-oxygen and stress monitoring | Continuous heart rate, HRV |
| Strap / band | 22 mm liquid-silicone strap with classic pin buckle | SuperKnit Luxe with ECG-compatible conductive clasp |
Tick a topic above to see how each product answers it.
Detailed comparison
Explore the full specifications, section by section.
These products have the same published specifications.
Similarities
- Both are rated for more than 14 days.
In summary
For most buyers the WHOOP Life is the better buy; the AmazFit Falcon makes sense if you want the time, notifications and workout stats on your wrist.
Back to compared products ↑In-stock alternatives
Related comparisons
AmazFit FalconSamsung Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 47mmAmazFit FalconApple Watch Series 12 42mmAmazFit FalconGoogle Pixel Watch 5 45mmAmazFit FalconApple Watch Series 12 46mmAmazFit FalconAmazfit T-Rex 3 ProAmazFit FalconAmazfit Balance 3AmazFit FalconHuawei Watch D3AmazFit Falcon
Amazfit T-Rex Ultra 2AmazFit Falcon
AmazFit T-Rex Ultra