Display
- Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 47mm
- 498 × 498 pixels
- Amazfit Balance 3
- 480 × 480 pixels; 323 ppi
Wearable comparison
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 47mm vs Amazfit Balance 3
Compare battery life, health tracking, display and fit.
01Selected  Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 47mm
KSh 62,000In Stock | 02  Amazfit Balance 3
KSh 48,000In Stock |
|---|
Add to comparison
2 spaces available
AmazFit FalconKSh 63,000
Amazfit T-Rex 3 ProKSh 55,000
WHOOP LifeKSh 55,500
Amazfit T-Rex Ultra 2KSh 85,000
Google Pixel Watch 5 45mmKSh 64,000
Apple Watch Series 12 42mmKSh 64,000
Apple Watch Series 12 46mmKSh 70,000
2 of 4 products
Our quick verdict
The Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 47mm has a bigger battery (800 mAh), takes ECG heart-rhythm readings and has a brighter screen for outdoor use, while the Amazfit Balance 3 lasts longer between charges (up to 21 days), works with Android phones and iPhones and syncs with apps such as Strava.
Software
- Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 47mm
- Runs Wear OS 7; One UI 9 Watch
- Amazfit Balance 3
- Runs Zepp OS 6
Battery capacity
- Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 47mm
- 800 mAh battery capacity
- Amazfit Balance 3
- 658 mAh battery capacity
Portability
- Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 47mm
- 61.5 g
- Amazfit Balance 3
- 62 g
Connections
- Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 47mm
- Bluetooth 5.3
- Amazfit Balance 3
- Bluetooth 5.2
Key differences
The main differences to help you choose.
Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 47mm
- Bigger battery: 800 mAh (vs 658 mAh).
- Brighter display: up to 5,000 nits (vs 3,000).
- ECG heart-rhythm readings.
- Titanium case (vs plastic case).
- Slimmer: 10.7 mm thick (vs 12.5 mm).
- Dual-band Wi-Fi (vs 2.4 GHz only).
Amazfit Balance 3
- Longer rated battery life: up to 21 days (vs 60 hours).
- Works with Android phones and iPhones.
- Syncs with third-party apps such as Strava and Apple Health.
- Lower price: KSh 48,000 (vs KSh 62,000).
What matters most to you?
6 priorities selected.
| Priority | Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 47mm | Amazfit Balance 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Up to 60 hours per charge | 658 mAh battery |
| Portability | 61.5 g | 62 g |
| Storage | 64 GB storage | 64 GB storage |
| Display | 1.52-inch OLED display | 1.5-inch OLED display, 323 ppi |
| Software | Wear OS 7 | Zepp OS 6 |
| Connections | Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| Battery capacity | 800 mAh battery | 658 mAh battery |
| Sensors | Samsung BioActive: optical heart-rate, electrical heart signal, bioelectrical impedance analysis | BioTracker 6.0 PPG, 5 PD + 2 LED |
| Sleep tracking | Sleep-stage tracking, sleep-apnea risk detection | Sleep HRV, sleep stages including REM |
| Charging | Fast wireless charging, WPC-based | Magnetic charging head |
| Water resistance | 10 ATM, IP69K | 10 ATM |
| Durability / certifications | MIL-STD-810H, EN13319 | Low pressure, high and low temperature |
| Positioning / GNSS | Dual-frequency GPS, L1 + L5 | Dual-band GNSS, 6 satellite systems |
| Health & wellness features | Heart rate, spO₂ | 24-hour heart rate, SpO₂ and stress |
| Controls / buttons | Touchscreen, home and Back buttons | Four physical buttons, touchscreen |
Tick a topic above to see how each product answers it.
Detailed comparison
Explore the full specifications, section by section.
These products have the same published specifications.
Similarities
- Both are water resistant to 100 m.
- Both take calls over Bluetooth.
- Both have OLED displays.
- Both offer 64 GB of storage.
- Both have similar screen sizes (1.52 and 1.5 inches).
- Both connect over Bluetooth.
In summary
Get the Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 47mm if you want a bigger battery and ECG heart-rhythm readings, or the Amazfit Balance 3 if you would rather have longer battery life and a choice of Android phone or iPhone.
Back to compared products ↑