Display
- Amazfit Active 3 Premium
- 466 × 466 pixels; 353 ppi
- Samsung Galaxy Watch 6
- 44 mm: 480 × 480 pixels; 40 mm: 432 × 432 pixels
Wearable comparison
Amazfit Active 3 Premium vs Samsung Galaxy Watch 6
Compare battery life, health tracking, display and fit.
01Selected  Amazfit Active 3 Premium
KSh 24,000In Stock | 02  Samsung Galaxy Watch 6
KSh 22,500In Stock |
|---|
Add to comparison
2 spaces available
Amazfit GTR 3 ProKSh 20,000
AmazFit Cheetah RoundKSh 28,000
AmazFit BalanceKSh 22,000
Amazfit Active MaxKSh 24,000
Amazfit Active 2 Premium RoundKSh 22,000
AmazFit CheetahKSh 28,000
OnePlus Watch LiteKSh 25,000
2 of 4 products
Our quick verdict
The Amazfit Active 3 Premium lasts longer between charges (up to 12 days), works with Android phones and iPhones and has a brighter screen for outdoor use, while the Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 takes ECG heart-rhythm readings, is lighter to wear all day and has a larger 1.5-inch screen.
Battery life
- Amazfit Active 3 Premium
- 365 mAh battery
- Samsung Galaxy Watch 6
- Up to 40 hours per charge
Portability
- Amazfit Active 3 Premium
- 38 g
- Samsung Galaxy Watch 6
- 33.3 g
Software
- Amazfit Active 3 Premium
- Zepp
- Samsung Galaxy Watch 6
- Wear OS 4
Water resistance
- Amazfit Active 3 Premium
- 5 ATM
- Samsung Galaxy Watch 6
- IP68 water and dust resistance
Key differences
The main differences to help you choose.
Amazfit Active 3 Premium
- Longer rated battery life: up to 12 days (vs 40 hours).
- Brighter display: up to 3,000 nits (vs 2,000).
- Works with Android phones and iPhones.
- Syncs with third-party apps such as Strava and Apple Health.
Samsung Galaxy Watch 6
- Larger 1.5-inch screen (vs 1.32-inch).
- Lighter: 33.3 g (vs 38 g).
- ECG heart-rhythm readings.
- Blood-pressure (hypertension) notifications.
- Slimmer: 9 mm thick (vs 11 mm).
What matters most to you?
6 priorities selected.
| Priority | Amazfit Active 3 Premium | Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | 365 mAh battery | Up to 40 hours per charge |
| Portability | 38 g | 33.3 g |
| Display | 1.32-inch OLED display, 353 ppi | 1.5-inch OLED display |
| Battery capacity | 365 mAh battery | 44 mm: 425 mAh |
| Software | Zepp | Wear OS 4 |
| Connections | Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | IP68 water and dust resistance |
| Sensors | BioTracker PPG, accelerometer | Samsung BioActive: optical heart-rate, electrical heart signal, bioelectrical impedance analysis |
| Sleep tracking | Sleep HRV, sleep stages including REM | Sleep tracking and sleep coaching |
| Charging | Magnetic charging head | Fast wireless charging, WPC-based |
| Durability / certifications | ISO 22810:2010 water-resistance testing, TUV-SUD report 68.189.26.01120.01 | MIL-STD-810H |
| Positioning / GNSS | 5 satellite positioning systems | GPS, GLONASS |
| Controls / buttons | Four physical buttons and touchscreen | Touchscreen and physical buttons |
| Calling | Bluetooth calling | Bluetooth calling with a connected smartphone |
| Training & outdoor features | Zepp Coach, peakBeats | GPS workout tracking and personalised heart-rate zones |
Tick a topic above to see how each product answers it.
Detailed comparison
Explore the full specifications, section by section.
These products have the same published specifications.
Similarities
- Both use Bluetooth 5.3.
- Both are water resistant to 50 m.
- Both take calls over Bluetooth.
- Both have OLED displays.
- Both have similar screen sizes (1.32 and 1.5 inches).
- Both connect over Bluetooth.
In summary
Get the Amazfit Active 3 Premium if you want longer battery life and a choice of Android phone or iPhone, or the Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 if you would rather have ECG heart-rhythm readings and a lighter watch for all-day wear.
Back to compared products ↑