Skip to content

Power bank comparison

Anker MagGo 622 Magnetic Battery vs Xiaomi Super Slim Magnetic Power Bank 5000

Compare capacity, charging speed, ports and weight.

Compared products
01Selected
Anker MagGo 622 Magnetic Battery

Anker MagGo 622 Magnetic Battery

  • 5,000 mAh battery capacity.
  • 140 g.
  • USB-C up to 12W.
  • Input profiles: USB-C: 5V⎓2.4A · 12W max.
  • Input ports: 1× USB-C.
KSh 6,020In Stock
02
Xiaomi Super Slim Magnetic Power Bank 5000

Xiaomi Super Slim Magnetic Power Bank 5000

  • 122 g.
  • 5,000 mAh battery.
  • 22.5 W rated output.
  • Input profiles: USB-C: 5V/3A, 9V/2.22A.
  • Input ports: 1 x USB-C.
KSh 5,080In Stock

Add to comparison

2 spaces available

Oraimo PowerJet 130 27600mAh 130W Power BankKSh 6,500
Anker 325 Power Bank, PowerCore 20,000mAHKSh 6,300
Anker Zolo Magnetic Power Bank 10,000mAh, 30W Built-in USB-C CableKSh 5,490
Ecoflow Rapid Magnetic Power Bank 5,000mAHKSh 7,500
Xiaomi Magnetic Power Bank 10000 with Built-in StandKSh 6,080
Anker Zolo Power Bank 20,000mAh 22.5W with Built-in USB-C CableKSh 6,300
Anker Power Bank 20,000mAh 30WKSh 5,520
2 of 4 products

Our quick verdict

The Xiaomi Super Slim Magnetic Power Bank 5000 is the better buy: it charges faster wirelessly (15 W) and is lighter (122 g), with the same 5,000 mAh battery as the Anker MagGo 622 Magnetic Battery.

Weight

Anker MagGo 622 Magnetic Battery
140 g
Xiaomi Super Slim Magnetic Power Bank 5000
122 g

Output power

Anker MagGo 622 Magnetic Battery
USB-C up to 12W
Xiaomi Super Slim Magnetic Power Bank 5000
22.5 W rated output

Input profiles

Anker MagGo 622 Magnetic Battery
USB-C: 5V⎓2.4A · 12W max
Xiaomi Super Slim Magnetic Power Bank 5000
USB-C: 5V/3A, 9V/2.22A

Key differences

The main differences to help you choose.

Anker MagGo 622 Magnetic Battery

  • 5,000 mAh battery.
  • USB-C up to 12W.
  • Weighs 140 g.

Xiaomi Super Slim Magnetic Power Bank 5000

  • Faster wireless charging: 15 W (vs 7.5 W).
  • Lighter: 122 g (vs 140 g).

What matters most to you?

Choose any priorities

How each product answers the questions buyers ask most. Tick a topic to add it, untick one to hide it.

4 priorities selected.
How each product answers the selected priorities
PriorityAnker MagGo 622 Magnetic BatteryXiaomi Super Slim Magnetic Power Bank 5000
Battery life5,000 mAh battery5,000 mAh battery
Portability140 g122 g
Output powerUSB-C up to 12W22.5 W rated output
Input profilesUSB-C: 5V⎓2.4A · 12W maxUSB-C: 5V/3A, 9V/2.22A

Detailed comparison

Explore the full specifications, section by section.

General

General specifications comparison
SpecificationAnker MagGo 622 Magnetic BatteryXiaomi Super Slim Magnetic Power Bank 5000
BrandAnkerXiaomi
Model622 Magnetic Battery (MagGo)71819 / 71820
Battery capacity5000mAh5,000mAh
Maximum output powerUSB-C up to 12W; wireless up to 7.5W22.5W wired; up to 15W EPP wireless; compatible iPhones up to 7.5W wireless
Input ports1× USB-C1 x USB-C
Output ports1× USB-C + magnetic wireless charging surface1 x USB-C; magnetic wireless charging pad
Input profilesUSB-C: 5V⎓2.4A · 12W maxUSB-C: 5V/3A, 9V/2.22A
Output profilesUSB-C: 5V⎓2.4A · 12W max; wireless: 7.5W maxUSB-C: 5V/3A, 9V/2.22A, 10V/2.25A; wireless: 5W / 7.5W / 10W / 15W
Integrated cableNo integrated cableNo
Net weight140g122 g
Design / CompatibilityFoldout magnetic stand; compatible MagSafe iPhone 12/13 series and magnetic cases; non-magnetic cases are not supported—
Rated capacity—3,000mAh at 5V
Rated energy—19.35Wh (3.87V, 5,000mAh)

Design

Design specifications comparison
SpecificationAnker MagGo 622 Magnetic BatteryXiaomi Super Slim Magnetic Power Bank 5000
Dimensions4.13 × 2.62 × 0.5 inches102 x 69.6 x 8.7 mm
Weight140g122 g

Similarities

  • Both have 5,000 mAh batteries.
  • Both support wireless charging.
  • Both charge over USB-C.

In summary

The Xiaomi Super Slim Magnetic Power Bank 5000 is the better buy for almost everyone, with faster wireless charging and a lighter build.

Back to compared products ↑

Related comparisons

Back to Top

My Cart