Skip to content

Power bank comparison

Anker MagGo 622 Magnetic Battery vs Anker Zolo Power Bank 20

Compare capacity, charging speed, ports and weight.

Compared products
01Selected
Anker MagGo 622 Magnetic Battery

Anker MagGo 622 Magnetic Battery

  • 5,000 mAh battery capacity.
  • 140 g.
  • USB-C up to 12W.
  • Input profiles: USB-C: 5V⎓2.4A · 12W max.
  • Input ports: 1× USB-C.
KSh 6,020In Stock
02
Anker Zolo Power Bank 20,000mAh 22.5W with Built-in USB-C Cable

Anker Zolo Power Bank 20,000mAh 22.5W with Built-in USB-C Cable

  • 15 W rated total output.
  • About 391 g.
  • 20,000 mAh battery.
  • Approximately 5.5 hours with suitable 20W charging equipment.
  • Input profiles: USB-C cable/port: 5V 3A or 9V 2.22A.
KSh 6,300In Stock

Add to comparison

2 spaces available

Oraimo PowerJet 130 27600mAh 130W Power BankKSh 6,500
Anker 325 Power Bank, PowerCore 20,000mAHKSh 6,300
Anker Zolo Magnetic Power Bank 10,000mAh, 30W Built-in USB-C CableKSh 5,490
Ecoflow Rapid Magnetic Power Bank 5,000mAHKSh 7,500
Xiaomi Super Slim Magnetic Power Bank 5000KSh 5,080
Xiaomi Magnetic Power Bank 10000 with Built-in StandKSh 6,080
Anker Power Bank 20,000mAh 30WKSh 5,520
2 of 4 products

Our quick verdict

The Anker Zolo Power Bank 20 has a much bigger battery (20,000 mAh), faster single-port charging (up to 20 W), a built-in cable and 3 charging ports, while the Anker MagGo 622 Magnetic Battery is lighter (140 g).

Weight

Anker MagGo 622 Magnetic Battery
140 g
Anker Zolo Power Bank 20
About 391 g

Battery life

Anker MagGo 622 Magnetic Battery
5,000 mAh battery
Anker Zolo Power Bank 20
20,000 mAh battery

Output power

Anker MagGo 622 Magnetic Battery
USB-C up to 12W
Anker Zolo Power Bank 20
22.5W supported individual mode

Ports

Anker MagGo 622 Magnetic Battery
1 output port
Anker Zolo Power Bank 20
3 output ports

Input profiles

Anker MagGo 622 Magnetic Battery
USB-C: 5V⎓2.4A · 12W max
Anker Zolo Power Bank 20
USB-C cable/port: 5V 3A or 9V 2.22A

Key differences

The main differences to help you choose.

Anker MagGo 622 Magnetic Battery

  • Lighter: 140 g (vs about 391 g).
  • Lower price: KSh 6,020 (vs KSh 6,300).
  • 7.5 W wireless charging.

Anker Zolo Power Bank 20

  • Bigger battery: 20,000 mAh (vs 5,000 mAh).
  • Faster single-port charging: up to 20 W (vs 12 W).
  • Built-in cable.
  • More ports: 3 (vs 1).

What matters most to you?

Choose any priorities

How each product answers the questions buyers ask most. Tick a topic to add it, untick one to hide it.

6 priorities selected.
How each product answers the selected priorities
PriorityAnker MagGo 622 Magnetic BatteryAnker Zolo Power Bank 20
Battery life5,000 mAh battery20,000 mAh battery
Portability140 gAbout 391 g
Output powerUSB-C up to 12W22.5W supported individual mode
Ports1 output port3 output ports
Input profilesUSB-C: 5V⎓2.4A · 12W maxUSB-C cable/port: 5V 3A or 9V 2.22A
Integrated cableNo integrated cableBuilt-in bidirectional USB-C cable

Detailed comparison

Explore the full specifications, section by section.

General

General specifications comparison
SpecificationAnker MagGo 622 Magnetic BatteryAnker Zolo Power Bank 20,000mAh 22.5W with Built-in USB-C Cable
BrandAnkerAnker
Model622 Magnetic Battery (MagGo)A110EH11
Battery capacity5000mAh20,000mAh at 3.7V nominal
Maximum output powerUSB-C up to 12W; wireless up to 7.5W22.5W supported individual mode; 15W shared total with multiple outputs
Input ports1× USB-CBuilt-in bidirectional USB-C cable and one USB-C port
Output ports1× USB-C + magnetic wireless charging surfaceBuilt-in USB-C cable, one USB-C port and one USB-A port
Input profilesUSB-C: 5V⎓2.4A · 12W maxUSB-C cable/port: 5V 3A or 9V 2.22A; 20W maximum
Output profilesUSB-C: 5V⎓2.4A · 12W max; wireless: 7.5W maxUSB-C cable/port: 5V 3A / 9V 2.22A / 10V 2.25A / 12V 1.67A; USB-A: 5V 3A / 9V 2A / 10V 2.25A / 12V 1.5A; 22.5W protocol-dependent; shared 5V 3A
Integrated cableNo integrated cableBuilt-in bidirectional USB-C cable
Net weight140gApproximately 391g
Design / CompatibilityFoldout magnetic stand; compatible MagSafe iPhone 12/13 series and magnetic cases; non-magnetic cases are not supported—
Rated energy—74Wh
Power-bank charging time—Approximately 5.5 hours with suitable 20W charging equipment
Individual output—Up to 22.5W with compatible Huawei protocol; other supported devices USB-C up to 20W / USB-A up to 18W
Multiple outputs—15W maximum shared total
Connections—Built-in USB-C cable, one USB-C port and one USB-A port
Input—Up to 20W through built-in USB-C cable or USB-C port
Display—Digital battery percentage; charging and low-current indicators
Recharge time—Approximately 5.5 hours using suitable 20W input equipment; actual time varies
Low-current mode—Double-press power button for USB-A accessories; automatic exit after 2 hours; USB-C adjusts current automatically
Package contents—Black power bank with attached USB-C cable and operating documentation; mains adapter separate

Design

Design specifications comparison
SpecificationAnker MagGo 622 Magnetic BatteryAnker Zolo Power Bank 20,000mAh 22.5W with Built-in USB-C Cable
Dimensions4.13 × 2.62 × 0.5 inchesApproximately 141 × 72 × 28mm
Weight140gApproximately 391g

Similarities

  • Both charge over USB-C.
  • Both are made by Anker.

In summary

For most buyers the Anker Zolo Power Bank 20 is the better buy; the Anker MagGo 622 Magnetic Battery makes sense if you want a lighter build.

Back to compared products ↑

Related comparisons

Back to Top

My Cart