Display
- AmazFit Balance
- 480 × 480 pixels; 323 ppi
- Amazfit Active 2 Premium Round
- 466 × 466 pixels; 353 ppi
Wearable comparison
AmazFit Balance vs Amazfit Active 2 Premium Round
Compare battery life, health tracking, display and fit.
01Selected  AmazFit Balance
KSh 22,000Out of Stock | 02  Amazfit Active 2 Premium Round
KSh 22,000In Stock |
|---|
Add to comparison
2 spaces available
Amazfit GTR 3 ProKSh 20,000
Samsung Galaxy Watch 6KSh 22,500
Samsung Galaxy Watch 6 ClassicKSh 22,500
Samsung Galaxy Watch 7KSh 22,500
Huawei Watch GT 5KSh 21,500
Amazfit Helio StrapKSh 22,000
Amazfit Active MaxKSh 24,000
2 of 4 products
Our quick verdict
The AmazFit Balance lasts longer between charges (14 days typical), gives daily readiness scores and has a larger 1.5-inch screen, while the Amazfit Active 2 Premium Round is lighter to wear all day.
Software
- AmazFit Balance
- Runs Zepp OS 4
- Amazfit Active 2 Premium Round
- Runs Zepp OS
Capacity
- AmazFit Balance
- 475 mAh battery capacity
- Amazfit Active 2 Premium Round
- 270 mAh battery capacity
Portability
- AmazFit Balance
- 35 g
- Amazfit Active 2 Premium Round
- 31.65 g
Connections
- AmazFit Balance
- Bluetooth 5.0
- Amazfit Active 2 Premium Round
- Bluetooth 5.2
Key differences
The main differences to help you choose.
AmazFit Balance
- Longer battery life: up to 14 days in typical use (vs 10).
- Longer sport-mode battery: up to 26 hours in GPS mode (vs 21 hours in GPS mode).
- Bigger battery: 475 mAh (vs 270 mAh).
- Larger 1.5-inch screen (vs 1.32-inch).
- Daily readiness scores.
Amazfit Active 2 Premium Round
- Lighter: 31.65 g (vs 35 g).
- Newer Bluetooth 5.2 (vs 5.0).
What matters most to you?
6 priorities selected.
| Priority | AmazFit Balance | Amazfit Active 2 Premium Round |
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | 475 mAh battery | 270 mAh battery |
| Portability | 35 g | 31.65 g |
| Display | 1.5-inch OLED display, 323 ppi | 1.32-inch OLED display, 353 ppi |
| Software | Zepp OS 4 | Zepp OS |
| Connections | Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| Sensors | BioTracker 5.0 PPG, 8 PD + 2 LED | BioTracker PPG, accelerometer |
| Sleep tracking | Sleep stages including REM, naps | Sleep HRV, sleep stages including REM |
| Charging | Magnetic charging | Magnetic charging head |
| Positioning / GNSS | Dual-band GNSS, circularly polarized antenna | 5 satellite positioning systems, circularly polarized antenna |
| Third-party fitness apps | Adidas Running, strava | Strava, adidas Running |
| Controls / buttons | 2 controls including crown, touchscreen | Two physical buttons and touchscreen |
| Strap / band | 22 mm liquid silicone with pin buckle or nylon with hook-and-loop fastening | 20 mm quick-release leather, pin buckle |
| Case material | Aluminum alloy, fibre-reinforced polymer | Stainless-steel bezel, polymer frame |
| Pixels per inch | 323 ppi | 353 ppi |
Tick a topic above to see how each product answers it.
Detailed comparison
Explore the full specifications, section by section.
These products have the same published specifications.
Similarities
- Both have a plastic case.
- Both are water resistant to 50 m.
- Both take calls over Bluetooth.
- Both run Zepp OS.
- Both have OLED displays.
- Both have similar screen sizes (1.5 and 1.32 inches).
In summary
For most buyers the AmazFit Balance is the better buy; the Amazfit Active 2 Premium Round makes sense if you want a lighter watch for all-day wear.
Back to compared products ↑In-stock alternatives
Related comparisons
Amazfit GTR 3 ProAmazFit BalanceSamsung Galaxy Watch 6AmazFit BalanceSamsung Galaxy Watch 6 ClassicAmazFit BalanceAmazFit BalanceSamsung Galaxy Watch 7AmazFit BalanceHuawei Watch GT 5AmazFit BalanceAmazfit Helio StrapAmazFit BalanceAmazfit Active MaxAmazFit Balance
Amazfit Active 3 PremiumAmazFit Balance
Xiaomi Watch S4