Display
- AmazFit Active
- 390 × 450 pixels; 341 ppi
- Redmi Watch 3
- 390 × 450 pixels
Wearable comparison
AmazFit Active vs Redmi Watch 3
Compare battery life, health tracking, display and fit.
01Selected  AmazFit Active
KSh 12,500Out of Stock | 02  Redmi Watch 3
KSh 10,500Out of Stock |
|---|
Add to comparison
2 spaces available
Fitbit Inspire 3KSh 14,000
Oraimo Watch ES OSW-41KSh 10,500
AmazFit Active EdgeKSh 17,000
OnePlus Nord WatchKSh 11,000
CMF Watch 3 ProKSh 11,500
Amazfit Bip 6KSh 14,500
Amazfit Active 2 RoundKSh 16,500
2 of 4 products
Our quick verdict
The AmazFit Active is the better buy: it lasts longer between charges (up to 14 days), gives daily readiness scores and syncs with apps such as Strava, with the same 1.75-inch OLED screen as the Redmi Watch 3.
Capacity
- AmazFit Active
- 300 mAh battery capacity
- Redmi Watch 3
- 289 mAh battery capacity
Portability
- AmazFit Active
- 35.7 g
- Redmi Watch 3
- 37 g
Software
- AmazFit Active
- Zepp OS 4
- Redmi Watch 3
- Mi Fitness
Water resistance
- AmazFit Active
- 5 ATM
- Redmi Watch 3
- 5ATM
Key differences
The main differences to help you choose.
AmazFit Active
- Longer rated battery life: up to 14 days (vs 7 days).
- Daily readiness scores.
- Syncs with third-party apps such as Strava and Apple Health.
Redmi Watch 3
- 1.75-inch OLED display.
- 289 mAh battery.
- 5ATM.
- Weighs 37 g.
What matters most to you?
6 priorities selected.
| Priority | AmazFit Active | Redmi Watch 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | 300 mAh battery | 289 mAh battery |
| Portability | 35.7 g | 37 g |
| Display | 1.75-inch OLED display, 341 ppi | 1.75-inch OLED display |
| Software | Zepp OS 4 | Mi Fitness |
| Connections | Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM | 5ATM |
| Sensors | BioTracker PPG, accelerometer | Heart-rate sensor with blood-oxygen sensor |
| Sleep tracking | Sleep stages including REM, naps | Deep, light and REM sleep-stage monitoring |
| Charging | Magnetic charging | Magnetic charging cable |
| Controls / buttons | 1 button, touchscreen | Touchscreen and side button |
| Wrist size | Silicone: 135–190 mm, vegan leather: 135–200 mm | 135–200mm |
| Strap / band | 20 mm silicone or vegan leather | Black: TPU, ivory: silicone |
| Calling | Bluetooth calling | Bluetooth voice calls through a connected phone |
| Training & outdoor features | Zepp Coach, peakBeats | 10 built-in running courses and independent five-system GNSS |
Tick a topic above to see how each product answers it.
Detailed comparison
Explore the full specifications, section by section.
These products have the same published specifications.
Similarities
- Both use Bluetooth 5.2.
- Both are water resistant to 50 m.
- Both take calls over Bluetooth.
- Both have OLED displays.
- Both have 1.75-inch screens.
- Both connect over Bluetooth.
In summary
The AmazFit Active is the better buy for almost everyone, with longer battery life and daily readiness scores.
Back to compared products ↑In-stock alternatives
Related comparisons
AmazFit ActiveFitbit Inspire 3AmazFit ActiveOraimo Watch ES OSW-41AmazFit ActiveAmazFit Active EdgeOnePlus Nord WatchAmazFit ActiveAmazFit ActiveCMF Watch 3 ProAmazFit ActiveAmazfit Bip 6AmazFit ActiveAmazfit Active 2 RoundAmazFit Active
Huawei Band 11 ProAmazFit Active
Xiaomi Smart Band 10 Ceramic Edition