Display
- AmazFit Active
- 390 × 450 pixels; 341 ppi
- Amazfit Active 2 Round
- 466 × 466 pixels; 353 ppi
Wearable comparison
AmazFit Active vs Amazfit Active 2 Round
Compare battery life, health tracking, display and fit.
01Selected  AmazFit Active
KSh 12,500Out of Stock | 02  Amazfit Active 2 Round
KSh 16,500In Stock |
|---|
Add to comparison
2 spaces available
Fitbit Inspire 3KSh 14,000
Oraimo Watch ES OSW-41KSh 10,500
AmazFit Active EdgeKSh 17,000
OnePlus Nord WatchKSh 11,000
Redmi Watch 3KSh 10,500
CMF Watch 3 ProKSh 11,500
Amazfit Bip 6KSh 14,500
2 of 4 products
Our quick verdict
The AmazFit Active lasts longer between charges (14 days typical), gives daily readiness scores and has a larger 1.75-inch screen, while the Amazfit Active 2 Round is lighter to wear all day.
Capacity
- AmazFit Active
- 300 mAh battery capacity
- Amazfit Active 2 Round
- 270 mAh battery capacity
Portability
- AmazFit Active
- 35.7 g
- Amazfit Active 2 Round
- 29.5 g
Software
- AmazFit Active
- Zepp OS 4
- Amazfit Active 2 Round
- Zepp
Sleep tracking
- AmazFit Active
- Sleep stages including REM, naps
- Amazfit Active 2 Round
- Sleep HRV, sleep stages including REM
Key differences
The main differences to help you choose.
AmazFit Active
- Longer battery life: up to 14 days in typical use (vs 10).
- Bigger battery: 300 mAh (vs 270 mAh).
- Larger 1.75-inch screen (vs 1.32-inch).
- Daily readiness scores.
Amazfit Active 2 Round
- Lighter: 29.5 g (vs 35.7 g).
- Slimmer: 9.9 mm thick (vs 10.7 mm).
What matters most to you?
6 priorities selected.
| Priority | AmazFit Active | Amazfit Active 2 Round |
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | 300 mAh battery | 270 mAh battery |
| Portability | 35.7 g | 29.5 g |
| Display | 1.75-inch OLED display, 341 ppi | 1.32-inch OLED display, 353 ppi |
| Software | Zepp OS 4 | Zepp |
| Sleep tracking | Sleep stages including REM, naps | Sleep HRV, sleep stages including REM |
| Charging | Magnetic charging | Magnetic charging head |
| Positioning / GNSS | GPS, GLONASS | 5 satellite positioning systems, circularly polarized antenna |
| Smart recognition | 7 sports movements | 25 strength-training movements, 8 sports movements |
| Third-party fitness apps | Adidas Running, strava | Strava, adidas Running |
| Controls / buttons | 1 button, touchscreen | Two physical buttons and touchscreen |
| Wrist size | Silicone: 135–190 mm, vegan leather: 135–200 mm | 135–195 mm |
| Strap / band | 20 mm silicone or vegan leather | 20 mm quick-release silicone, pin buckle |
| Case material | Aluminum alloy or stainless steel | Stainless-steel bezel, polymer frame |
| Pixels per inch | 341 ppi | 353 ppi |
Tick a topic above to see how each product answers it.
Detailed comparison
Explore the full specifications, section by section.
These products have the same published specifications.
Similarities
- Both use Bluetooth 5.2.
- Both have a plastic case.
- Both are water resistant to 50 m.
- Both take calls over Bluetooth.
- Both have OLED displays.
- Both connect over Bluetooth.
In summary
For most buyers the AmazFit Active is the better buy; the Amazfit Active 2 Round makes sense if you want a lighter watch for all-day wear.
Back to compared products ↑
Huawei Band 11 Pro
Xiaomi Smart Band 10 Ceramic Edition