Display
- Apple Watch Series 10
- 42mm: 374 × 446 pixels; 46mm: 416 × 496 pixels; 326 ppi
- Amazfit Balance 3
- 480 × 480 pixels; 323 ppi
Wearable comparison
Apple Watch Series 10 vs Amazfit Balance 3
Compare battery life, health tracking, display and fit.
01Selected  Apple Watch Series 10
KSh 47,000In Stock | 02  Amazfit Balance 3
KSh 48,000In Stock |
|---|
Add to comparison
2 spaces available
Apple Watch Series 11KSh 51,000
WHOOP Life MGKSh 50,000
Apple Watch Series 8KSh 50,000
Apple Watch Series 9KSh 45,000
AmazFit T-Rex UltraKSh 47,000
Amazfit GTR 3 ProKSh 20,000
Apple Watch SE 2KSh 28,500
2 of 4 products
Our quick verdict
The Apple Watch Series 10 runs watchOS built around the iPhone, takes ECG heart-rhythm readings, is lighter to wear all day and has a depth gauge for snorkelling, though it works only with an iPhone, while the Amazfit Balance 3 lasts much longer between charges (21 days vs 18 hours), works with Android phones and iPhones and has a brighter screen for outdoor use.
Software
- Apple Watch Series 10
- Runs watchOS 11, upgradable to watchOS 27
- Amazfit Balance 3
- Runs Zepp OS 6
Battery life
- Apple Watch Series 10
- Up to 18 hours per charge
- Amazfit Balance 3
- 658 mAh battery
Portability
- Apple Watch Series 10
- 30 g
- Amazfit Balance 3
- 62 g
Connections
- Apple Watch Series 10
- Wi-Fi 4, Bluetooth 5.3
- Amazfit Balance 3
- Bluetooth 5.2
Key differences
The main differences to help you choose.
Apple Watch Series 10
- Lighter: 30 g (vs 62 g).
- ECG heart-rhythm readings.
- Slimmer: 9.7 mm thick (vs 12.5 mm).
- Depth gauge for snorkelling (to 6 m).
- Dual-band Wi-Fi (vs 2.4 GHz only).
Amazfit Balance 3
- Longer battery life: up to 21 days (vs 18 hours).
- Brighter display: up to 3,000 nits (vs 2,000).
- Works with Android phones and iPhones.
- Syncs with third-party apps such as Strava and Apple Health.
What matters most to you?
6 priorities selected.
| Priority | Apple Watch Series 10 | Amazfit Balance 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Up to 18 hours per charge | 658 mAh battery |
| Portability | 30 g | 62 g |
| Storage | 64 GB storage | 64 GB storage |
| Display | OLED display, 326 ppi | 1.5-inch OLED display, 323 ppi |
| Software | watchOS 11 | Zepp OS 6 |
| Connections | Wi-Fi 4, Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| Water resistance | 50 m | 10 ATM |
| Sensors | Electrical heart sensor, third-generation optical heart sensor | BioTracker 6.0 PPG, 5 PD + 2 LED |
| Sleep tracking | Sleep duration and sleep stages | Sleep HRV, sleep stages including REM |
| Charging | Magnetic fast charging | Magnetic charging head |
| Peak brightness | Up to 2,000 nits peak | 3,000 nits peak |
| Durability / certifications | IP6X dust resistance | Low pressure, high and low temperature |
| Health & wellness features | ECG app, blood oxygen feature where available | 24-hour heart rate, SpO₂ and stress |
| Controls / buttons | Digital Crown with haptic feedback | Four physical buttons, touchscreen |
| Wrist size | 42mm: 130–200 mm, 46mm: 140–245 mm | 140–210 mm |
Tick a topic above to see how each product answers it.
Detailed comparison
Explore the full specifications, section by section.
These products have the same published specifications.
Similarities
- Both take calls over Bluetooth.
- Both have OLED displays.
- Both offer 64 GB of storage.
- Both connect over Bluetooth.
- Both have a speaker.
- Both have a microphone.
In summary
Get the Amazfit Balance 3 if you want much longer battery life and a choice of Android phone or iPhone, or the Apple Watch Series 10 if you would rather have ECG heart-rhythm readings and a lighter watch for all-day wear.
Back to compared products ↑
