Display
- AmazFit Cheetah
- 454 × 454 pixels, 326 ppi
- AmazFit Cheetah Round
- 454 × 454 pixels; 326 ppi
Wearable comparison
AmazFit Cheetah vs AmazFit Cheetah Round
Compare battery life, health tracking, display and fit.
01Selected  AmazFit Cheetah
KSh 28,000Out of Stock | 02  AmazFit Cheetah Round
KSh 28,000Out of Stock |
|---|
Add to comparison
2 spaces available
Samsung Galaxy Watch 8KSh 27,500
Huawei Watch Fit 5 ProKSh 27,000
Amazfit T-Rex 3KSh 33,000
Amazfit Active MaxKSh 24,000
Amazfit Active 3 PremiumKSh 24,000
OnePlus Watch 2RKSh 28,500
Huawei Watch GT 6KSh 28,000
2 of 4 products
Our quick verdict
With the same 1.39-inch OLED screen and 440 mAh battery, the AmazFit Cheetah Round is the better buy: it lasts longer in outdoor workouts (44 vs 26 hours) and syncs with apps such as Strava.
Sensors
- AmazFit Cheetah
- BioTracker PPG biometric sensor
- AmazFit Cheetah Round
- BioTracker PPG, accelerometer
Charging
- AmazFit Cheetah
- Magnetic charging, approximately 2 hours
- AmazFit Cheetah Round
- Magnetic charging
Water resistance
- AmazFit Cheetah
- 5 ATM, ISO 22810:2010
- AmazFit Cheetah Round
- 5 ATM
Positioning / GNSS
- AmazFit Cheetah
- Built-in dual-band L1/L5 positioning, six satellite systems
- AmazFit Cheetah Round
- Dual-band GNSS, circularly polarized antenna
Key differences
The main differences to help you choose.
AmazFit Cheetah
- 1.39-inch OLED display, 326 ppi.
- 2.3 GB storage.
- 440 mAh battery.
- 5 ATM.
AmazFit Cheetah Round
- Longer sport-mode battery: up to 44 hours in GPS mode (vs 26 hours in GPS: mode).
- Syncs with third-party apps such as Strava and Apple Health.
What matters most to you?
6 priorities selected.
| Priority | AmazFit Cheetah | AmazFit Cheetah Round |
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | 440 mAh battery | 440 mAh battery |
| Portability | 47 g | 47 g |
| Display | 1.39-inch OLED display, 326 ppi | 1.39-inch OLED display, 326 ppi |
| Software | Zepp OS 3.5 | Zepp OS 3.5 |
| Connections | Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| Sensors | BioTracker PPG biometric sensor with SpO₂ | BioTracker PPG, accelerometer |
| Charging | Magnetic charging, approximately 2 hours | Magnetic charging |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM, ISO 22810:2010 | 5 ATM |
| Positioning / GNSS | Built-in dual-band L1/L5 positioning, six satellite systems | Dual-band GNSS, circularly polarized antenna |
| Health & wellness features | 24-hour heart-rate, blood-oxygen and stress monitoring | 24-hour heart rate, SpO₂ and stress |
| Controls / buttons | Two physical controls including crown | 2 controls including crown, touchscreen |
| Training & outdoor features | MaxTrack dual-band positioning, offline maps and route import/navigation | Zepp Coach, peakBeats |
Tick a topic above to see how each product answers it.
Detailed comparison
Explore the full specifications, section by section.
These products have the same published specifications.
Similarities
- Both have 440 mAh batteries.
- Both have a plastic case.
- Both are water resistant to 50 m.
- Both are rated for up to 14 days of typical use on a charge.
- Both have OLED displays.
- Both have 1.39-inch screens.
In summary
The AmazFit Cheetah Round is the better buy for almost everyone, with longer battery for long outdoor workouts and syncing with apps such as Strava.
Back to compared products ↑In-stock alternatives
Related comparisons
AmazFit CheetahSamsung Galaxy Watch 8AmazFit CheetahHuawei Watch Fit 5 ProAmazFit CheetahAmazfit T-Rex 3AmazFit CheetahAmazfit Active MaxAmazFit CheetahAmazfit Active 3 PremiumAmazFit CheetahOnePlus Watch 2RAmazFit CheetahHuawei Watch GT 6AmazFit Cheetah
Fitbit EdgeAmazFit CheetahAmazfit Cheetah 2 Pro