Display
- AmazFit Cheetah
- 454 × 454 pixels, 326 ppi
- Amazfit Active 3 Premium
- 466 × 466 pixels; 353 ppi
Wearable comparison
AmazFit Cheetah vs Amazfit Active 3 Premium
Compare battery life, health tracking, display and fit.
01Selected  AmazFit Cheetah
KSh 28,000Out of Stock | 02  Amazfit Active 3 Premium
KSh 24,000In Stock |
|---|
Add to comparison
2 spaces available
Samsung Galaxy Watch 8KSh 27,500
Huawei Watch Fit 5 ProKSh 27,000
AmazFit Cheetah RoundKSh 28,000
Amazfit T-Rex 3KSh 33,000
Amazfit Active MaxKSh 24,000
OnePlus Watch 2RKSh 28,500
Huawei Watch GT 6KSh 28,000
2 of 4 products
Our quick verdict
The Amazfit Active 3 Premium is lighter to wear all day and has a brighter screen for outdoor use and a sturdier stainless steel build, while the AmazFit Cheetah has a bigger battery (440 mAh).
Capacity
- AmazFit Cheetah
- 440 mAh battery capacity
- Amazfit Active 3 Premium
- 365 mAh battery capacity
Portability
- AmazFit Cheetah
- 47 g
- Amazfit Active 3 Premium
- 38 g
Software
- AmazFit Cheetah
- Zepp OS 3.5
- Amazfit Active 3 Premium
- Zepp
Sensors
- AmazFit Cheetah
- BioTracker PPG biometric sensor
- Amazfit Active 3 Premium
- BioTracker PPG, accelerometer
Key differences
The main differences to help you choose.
AmazFit Cheetah
- Bigger battery: 440 mAh (vs 365 mAh).
- Slightly larger 1.39-inch screen (vs 1.32-inch).
Amazfit Active 3 Premium
- Brighter display: up to 3,000 nits (vs 1,000).
- Lighter: 38 g (vs 47 g).
- Stainless steel case (vs plastic case).
- Slimmer: 11 mm thick (vs 11.9 mm).
- Syncs with third-party apps such as Strava and Apple Health.
What matters most to you?
6 priorities selected.
| Priority | AmazFit Cheetah | Amazfit Active 3 Premium |
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | 440 mAh battery | 365 mAh battery |
| Portability | 47 g | 38 g |
| Display | 1.39-inch OLED display, 326 ppi | 1.32-inch OLED display, 353 ppi |
| Software | Zepp OS 3.5 | Zepp |
| Connections | Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| Sensors | BioTracker PPG biometric sensor with SpO₂ | BioTracker PPG, accelerometer |
| Sleep tracking | Sleep stages including REM, daytime naps | Sleep HRV, sleep stages including REM |
| Charging | Magnetic charging, approximately 2 hours | Magnetic charging head |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM, ISO 22810:2010 | 5 ATM |
| Durability / certifications | Bureau Veritas-tested 5 ATM water resistance | ISO 22810:2010 water-resistance testing, TUV-SUD report 68.189.26.01120.01 |
| Positioning / GNSS | Built-in dual-band L1/L5 positioning, six satellite systems | 5 satellite positioning systems |
| Health & wellness features | 24-hour heart-rate, blood-oxygen and stress monitoring | 24-hour heart rate, SpO₂ and stress |
| Controls / buttons | Two physical controls including crown | Four physical buttons and touchscreen |
| Strap / band | 22 mm liquid-silicone strap with classic pin buckle | 20 mm silicone, pin buckle |
Tick a topic above to see how each product answers it.
Detailed comparison
Explore the full specifications, section by section.
These products have the same published specifications.
Similarities
- Both use Bluetooth 5.3.
- Both are water resistant to 50 m.
- Both have OLED displays.
- Both have similar screen sizes (1.39 and 1.32 inches).
- Both connect over Bluetooth.
In summary
For most buyers the Amazfit Active 3 Premium is the better buy; the AmazFit Cheetah makes sense if you want a bigger battery.
Back to compared products ↑
Fitbit Edge