Display
- AmazFit Cheetah
- 454 × 454 pixels, 326 ppi
- Amazfit Active Max
- 480 × 480 pixels; 323 ppi
Wearable comparison
AmazFit Cheetah vs Amazfit Active Max
Compare battery life, health tracking, display and fit.
01Selected  AmazFit Cheetah
KSh 28,000Out of Stock | 02  Amazfit Active Max
KSh 24,000In Stock |
|---|
Add to comparison
2 spaces available
Samsung Galaxy Watch 8KSh 27,500
Huawei Watch Fit 5 ProKSh 27,000
AmazFit Cheetah RoundKSh 28,000
Amazfit T-Rex 3KSh 33,000
Amazfit Active 3 PremiumKSh 24,000
OnePlus Watch 2RKSh 28,500
Huawei Watch GT 6KSh 28,000
2 of 4 products
Our quick verdict
The Amazfit Active Max is the better buy: it lasts longer between charges (25 days typical), is lighter to wear all day and has a brighter screen for outdoor use.
Software
- AmazFit Cheetah
- Runs Zepp OS 3.5
- Amazfit Active Max
- Runs Zepp OS 6
Capacity
- AmazFit Cheetah
- 440 mAh battery capacity
- Amazfit Active Max
- 658 mAh battery capacity
Portability
- AmazFit Cheetah
- 47 g
- Amazfit Active Max
- 39.5 g
Storage
- AmazFit Cheetah
- 2.3 GB storage
- Amazfit Active Max
- 4 GB storage
Key differences
The main differences to help you choose.
AmazFit Cheetah
- 1.39-inch OLED display, 326 ppi.
- 2.3 GB storage.
- 440 mAh battery.
- 5 ATM.
Amazfit Active Max
- Longer battery life: up to 25 days in typical use (vs 14).
- Longer sport-mode battery: up to 64 hours in GPS mode (vs 26 hours in GPS: mode).
- Bigger battery: 658 mAh (vs 440 mAh).
- Brighter display: up to 3,000 nits (vs 1,000).
- Lighter: 39.5 g (vs 47 g).
- More storage: 4 GB (vs 2.3 GB).
What matters most to you?
6 priorities selected.
| Priority | AmazFit Cheetah | Amazfit Active Max |
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | 440 mAh battery | 658 mAh battery |
| Portability | 47 g | 39.5 g |
| Storage | 2.3 GB storage | 4 GB storage |
| Display | 1.39-inch OLED display, 326 ppi | 1.5-inch OLED display, 323 ppi |
| Software | Zepp OS 3.5 | Zepp OS 6 |
| Connections | Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| Sensors | BioTracker PPG biometric sensor with SpO₂ | BioTracker PPG, accelerometer |
| Sleep tracking | Sleep stages including REM, daytime naps | Sleep HRV, sleep stages including REM |
| Charging | Magnetic charging, approximately 2 hours | Magnetic charging head |
| Water resistance | 5 ATM, ISO 22810:2010 | 5 ATM |
| Positioning / GNSS | Built-in dual-band L1/L5 positioning, six satellite systems | 5 satellite positioning systems |
| Health & wellness features | 24-hour heart-rate, blood-oxygen and stress monitoring | 24-hour heart rate, SpO₂ and stress |
| Controls / buttons | Two physical controls including crown | Two physical buttons and touchscreen |
| Training & outdoor features | MaxTrack dual-band positioning, offline maps and route import/navigation | Zepp Coach, peakBeats |
Tick a topic above to see how each product answers it.
Detailed comparison
Explore the full specifications, section by section.
These products have the same published specifications.
Similarities
- Both use Bluetooth 5.3.
- Both have a plastic case.
- Both are water resistant to 50 m.
- Both have OLED displays.
- Both have similar screen sizes (1.39 and 1.5 inches).
- Both connect over Bluetooth.
In summary
The Amazfit Active Max is the better buy for almost everyone, with longer battery life and a lighter watch for all-day wear.
Back to compared products ↑In-stock alternatives
Related comparisons
AmazFit CheetahSamsung Galaxy Watch 8AmazFit CheetahHuawei Watch Fit 5 ProAmazFit CheetahAmazFit Cheetah RoundAmazFit CheetahAmazfit T-Rex 3AmazFit CheetahAmazfit Active 3 PremiumAmazFit CheetahOnePlus Watch 2RAmazFit CheetahHuawei Watch GT 6AmazFit Cheetah
Fitbit EdgeAmazFit CheetahAmazfit Cheetah 2 Pro