Skip to content

Power bank comparison

Xiaomi 67W Power Bank 20000 vs Anker Zolo Power Bank 20

Compare capacity, charging speed, ports and weight.

Compared products
01Selected
Xiaomi 67W Power Bank 20000 (Integrated Cable)

Xiaomi 67W Power Bank 20000 (Integrated Cable)

  • 20,000 mAh battery capacity.
  • 415 g.
  • 67 W rated output.
  • Power-bank charging time: approximately 2.5 hours under Xiaomi's stated fast-recharge test.
  • Input profiles: integrated USB-C / USB-C: 5V/3A, 9V/3A, 12V/3A, 15V/3A.
KSh 6,870In Stock
02
Anker Zolo Power Bank 20,000mAh 22.5W with Built-in USB-C Cable

Anker Zolo Power Bank 20,000mAh 22.5W with Built-in USB-C Cable

  • 15 W rated total output.
  • About 391 g.
  • 20,000 mAh battery.
  • Approximately 5.5 hours with suitable 20W charging equipment.
  • Input profiles: USB-C cable/port: 5V 3A or 9V 2.22A.
KSh 5,980In Stock
2 of 4 products

Add to comparison

2 spaces available

Xiaomi Power Bank 10000mAh 22.5W LiteKSh 1,850
Anker 325 Power Bank, PowerCore 20,000mAHKSh 4,050
Anker Laptop Power Bank 25,000mAh, 165W (Built-In and Retractable Cables)KSh 11,560
UGREEN 25000mAh 200W Fast Charging Power BankKSh 10,500

Our quick verdict

Choose the Xiaomi 67W Power Bank 20000 if you want faster recharging (2.5 hours). Choose the Anker Zolo Power Bank 20 if you want 3 charging ports and a lighter build (about 391 g).

Weight

Xiaomi 67W Power Bank 20000
415 g
Anker Zolo Power Bank 20
About 391 g

Output power

Xiaomi 67W Power Bank 20000
67 W rated output
Anker Zolo Power Bank 20
22.5W supported individual mode

Ports

Xiaomi 67W Power Bank 20000
2 output ports
Anker Zolo Power Bank 20
3 output ports

Integrated cable

Xiaomi 67W Power Bank 20000
Yes, USB-C
Anker Zolo Power Bank 20
Built-in bidirectional USB-C cable

Key differences

The main differences to help you choose.

Xiaomi 67W Power Bank 20000

  • Recharges faster: 2.5 hours.
  • Maximum output power: 67W.

Anker Zolo Power Bank 20

  • More ports: 3.
  • Lighter: about 391 g.
  • Maximum output power: 22.5W supported individual mode.

What matters most to you?

Choose any priorities

How each product answers the questions buyers ask most. Untick a topic to hide it.

6 priorities selected.

Xiaomi 67W Power Bank 20000

  • 20,000 mAh battery.
  • 415 g.
  • 67 W rated output.
  • 2 output ports.
  • Approximately 2.5 hours under Xiaomi's stated fast-recharge test conditions.
  • Yes, USB-C.

Anker Zolo Power Bank 20

  • 20,000 mAh battery.
  • About 391 g.
  • 22.5W supported individual mode.
  • 3 output ports.
  • Approximately 5.5 hours with suitable 20W charging equipment.
  • Built-in bidirectional USB-C cable.

Detailed comparison

Explore the full specifications, section by section.

General

General specifications comparison
SpecificationXiaomi 67W Power Bank 20000 (Integrated Cable)Anker Zolo Power Bank 20,000mAh 22.5W with Built-in USB-C Cable
BrandXiaomiAnker
Model71535; 71536A110EH11
Battery capacity20000mAh equivalent20,000mAh at 3.7V nominal
Rated capacity12000mAh at 5V/3A—
Rated energy74.37Wh at 11.1V/6700mAh74Wh
Maximum output power67W22.5W supported individual mode; 15W shared total with multiple outputs
Input portsIntegrated USB-C cable; 1 x USB-CBuilt-in bidirectional USB-C cable and one USB-C port
Output portsIntegrated USB-C cable; 1 x USB-C; 1 x USB-ABuilt-in USB-C cable, one USB-C port and one USB-A port
Input profilesIntegrated USB-C / USB-C: 5V/3A, 9V/3A, 12V/3A, 15V/3A, 20V/3.25AUSB-C cable/port: 5V 3A or 9V 2.22A; 20W maximum
Output profilesIntegrated USB-C / USB-C: 5V/3A, 9V/3A, 11V/6.1A, 12V/3A, 15V/3A, 20V/3.35A; USB-A: 5V/3A, 9V/2.23A, 10V/2.25A, 12V/1.67AUSB-C cable/port: 5V 3A / 9V 2.22A / 10V 2.25A / 12V 1.67A; USB-A: 5V 3A / 9V 2A / 10V 2.25A / 12V 1.5A; 22.5W protocol-dependent; shared 5V 3A
Integrated cableYes - USB-CBuilt-in bidirectional USB-C cable
Power-bank charging timeApproximately 2.5 hours under Xiaomi's stated fast-recharge test conditionsApproximately 5.5 hours with suitable 20W charging equipment
Net weight415gApproximately 391g

Design

Design specifications comparison
SpecificationXiaomi 67W Power Bank 20000 (Integrated Cable)Anker Zolo Power Bank 20,000mAh 22.5W with Built-in USB-C Cable
Dimensions140 × 72 × 31.2mmApproximately 141 × 72 × 28mm
Weight415gApproximately 391g

Additional specifications

Additional specifications specifications comparison
SpecificationXiaomi 67W Power Bank 20000 (Integrated Cable)Anker Zolo Power Bank 20,000mAh 22.5W with Built-in USB-C Cable
colourTan, Ice Blue—

Battery and charging

Battery and charging specifications comparison
SpecificationXiaomi 67W Power Bank 20000 (Integrated Cable)Anker Zolo Power Bank 20,000mAh 22.5W with Built-in USB-C Cable
Manufacturer hardware modelPB2067—
Cell capacity20000mAh equivalent—
Rated output capacity12000mAh at 5V/3A—
Battery energy74.37Wh—
Recharge inputUp to 65W with compatible adapter and charging mode—
Dimensions / weight140 × 72 × 31.2mm; 415g—
ColoursTan or Ice Blue—
Package contentsPower bank and user manual—

Product details

Product details specifications comparison
SpecificationXiaomi 67W Power Bank 20000 (Integrated Cable)Anker Zolo Power Bank 20,000mAh 22.5W with Built-in USB-C Cable
Individual output—Up to 22.5W with compatible Huawei protocol; other supported devices USB-C up to 20W / USB-A up to 18W
Multiple outputs—15W maximum shared total
Connections—Built-in USB-C cable, one USB-C port and one USB-A port
Input—Up to 20W through built-in USB-C cable or USB-C port
Display—Digital battery percentage; charging and low-current indicators
Recharge time—Approximately 5.5 hours using suitable 20W input equipment; actual time varies
Low-current mode—Double-press power button for USB-A accessories; automatic exit after 2 hours; USB-C adjusts current automatically
Package contents—Black power bank with attached USB-C cable and operating documentation; mains adapter separate

Similarities

  • Both have 20,000 mAh batteries.
  • Both charge over USB-C.

In summary

The Xiaomi 67W Power Bank 20000 has a 2.5-hour recharge time (vs 5.5 hours). The Anker Zolo Power Bank 20 has 3 ports (vs 2) and a weight of 391 g (vs 415 g). Both have 20,000 mAh batteries, and both charge over USB-C.

Back to compared products ↑

Related comparisons

Back to Top

My Cart