Skip to content

.esh-mobile-trigger,.esh-nav-trigger,.esh-more-wrap{display:none!important}.esh-noscript-nav{display:flex;flex-wrap:wrap;gap:12px;padding:12px 20px}Shop all products Audio Gaming Laptops Smartwatches Smartphones Accessories Tablets Storage Cameras More

Power bank comparison

Xiaomi Magnetic Power Bank 10000 with Built-in Stand vs Anker 622 Magnetic Battery MagGo Upgraded Version 5000mAh

Compare capacity, charging speed, ports and weight.

Compared products
01Selected Xiaomi Magnetic Power Bank 10000 with Built-in Stand 37 Wh of stored energy. 229 g. 33 W rated output. Wired charging: up to 33W. Input profiles: USB-C port or cable: 5V⎓3A. KSh 6,080In Stock Choose options	02 Anker 622 Magnetic Battery MagGo Upgraded Version 5000mAh 140 g. 5,000 mAh battery. 7.5 W rated output. Wireless output: up to 7.5W for compatible iPhones. Recharging: USB-C 5V 2.4A. KSh 5,240In Stock Add to cart

2 of 4 products

Add to comparison

2 spaces available

Oraimo PowerJet 130 27600mAh 130W Power BankKSh 6,500

Anker Zolo Power Bank 10,000mAh, 30W Built-In USB-C and Lightning CableKSh 5,360

UGREEN Nexode Power Bank 12000mAh 100WKSh 7,000

UGREEN Nexode 10000mAh 30W Two-way Fast Charging Power BankKSh 6,500

Our quick verdict

Choose the Xiaomi Magnetic Power Bank 10000 with Built-in Stand if you want a bigger 10,000 mAh battery, a higher 33 W rated output and 15 W wireless charging. Choose the Anker 622 Magnetic Battery MagGo Upgraded Version 5000mAh if you want a lighter build (140 g) and a slimmer 12.8 mm body.

Weight

Xiaomi Magnetic Power Bank 10000 with Built-in Stand: 229 g
Anker 622 Magnetic Battery MagGo Upgraded Version 5000mAh: 140 g

Battery life

Xiaomi Magnetic Power Bank 10000 with Built-in Stand: 10,000 mAh battery
Anker 622 Magnetic Battery MagGo Upgraded Version 5000mAh: 5,000 mAh battery

Output power

Xiaomi Magnetic Power Bank 10000 with Built-in Stand: 33 W rated output
Anker 622 Magnetic Battery MagGo Upgraded Version 5000mAh: 7.5 W rated output

Ports

Xiaomi Magnetic Power Bank 10000 with Built-in Stand: 2 output ports
Anker 622 Magnetic Battery MagGo Upgraded Version 5000mAh: 1 output port

Input profiles

Xiaomi Magnetic Power Bank 10000 with Built-in Stand: USB-C port or cable: 5V⎓3A
Anker 622 Magnetic Battery MagGo Upgraded Version 5000mAh: USB-C: 5V 2.4A, 12W

Key differences

The main differences to help you choose.

Xiaomi Magnetic Power Bank 10000 with Built-in Stand

Bigger battery: 10,000 mAh.
Higher rated output: 33 W.
Faster wireless charging: 15 W.
Built-in cable.
More ports: 2.

Anker 622 Magnetic Battery MagGo Upgraded Version 5000mAh

Lighter: 140 g.
Slimmer: 12.8 mm thick.
MultiProtect charging-protection system.

What matters most to you?

Choose any priorities

How each product answers the questions buyers ask most. Untick a topic to hide it.

6 priorities selected.

Xiaomi Magnetic Power Bank 10000 with Built-in Stand

10,000 mAh battery.
229 g.
33 W rated output.
37 Wh of stored energy.
2 output ports.
USB-C port or cable: 5V⎓3A.

Anker 622 Magnetic Battery MagGo Upgraded Version 5000mAh

5,000 mAh battery.
140 g.
7.5 W rated output.
5,000mAh at 3.85V nominal.
1 output port.
USB-C: 5V 2.4A, 12W.

Detailed comparison

Explore the full specifications, section by section.

General

General specifications comparison
Specification	Xiaomi Magnetic Power Bank 10000 with Built-in Stand	Anker 622 Magnetic Battery MagGo Upgraded Version 5000mAh
Brand	Xiaomi	Anker
Model	71806 / 71809	A1614H13
Battery capacity	10000mAh equivalent; internal pack 37Wh at 7.4V/5000mAh	5,000mAh at 3.85V nominal
Rated capacity	5900mAh at 5V/3A	—
Rated energy	37Wh	19.25Wh
Maximum output power	33W wired; up to 15W wireless; simultaneous wired and wireless 15W maximum	7.5W wireless or 12W wired; wired connection takes priority; no two-device simultaneous output
Input ports	USB-C port; integrated USB-C cable	Side USB-C port
Output ports	USB-C port; integrated USB-C cable; magnetic wireless charging	Side USB-C port; magnetic wireless pad
Input profiles	USB-C port or cable: 5V⎓3A; 9V⎓3A; 12V⎓2.5A	USB-C: 5V 2.4A; 12W
Output profiles	Cable or USB-C: 5V⎓3A; 9V⎓3A; 11V⎓3A; 12V⎓2.5A; 15V⎓2A, 33W maximum; shared wired 5V⎓3A, 15W maximum	USB-C: 5V 2.4A; wireless: 5W / 7.5W; total rated output 12W
Integrated cable	Integrated bidirectional USB-C cable	No integrated charging cable
Net weight	229g	140g

Design

Design specifications comparison
Specification	Xiaomi Magnetic Power Bank 10000 with Built-in Stand	Anker 622 Magnetic Battery MagGo Upgraded Version 5000mAh
Dimensions	108.8 × 68.9 × 20.25mm	105 × 66.5 × 12.8mm
Weight	229g	140g

Product details

Product details specifications comparison
Specification	Xiaomi Magnetic Power Bank 10000 with Built-in Stand	Anker 622 Magnetic Battery MagGo Upgraded Version 5000mAh
Battery energy	37Wh; 10000mAh equivalent capacity	—
Rated output capacity	5900mAh at 5V/3A	—
Wired charging	Up to 33W; up to 30W recharge with suitable equipment	—
Wireless charging	Up to 15W EPP; compatible iPhones up to 7.5W	—
Connections	Integrated USB-C cable; separate USB-C port	—
Stand	Adjustable folding stand; approximately 80-degree maximum	Integrated folding kickstand
Package contents	Power bank; user manual	Magnetic battery and manufacturer documentation; mains adapter separate; confirm supplied loose-cable contents
Wireless output	—	Up to 7.5W for compatible iPhones
Wired output	—	USB-C 5V 2.4A; up to 12W
Recharging	—	USB-C 5V 2.4A; suitable 12W or higher adapter separate
Hardware version	—	Upgraded A1614 with USB-C port on the side
Shared charging	—	No two-device simultaneous output; wired device takes priority
Compatibility	—	Compatible iPhone 12 and later with an appropriate magnetic case; not recommended for iPhone12/13mini
Protection	—	MultiProtect charging-protection system

Similarities

Both support wireless charging.
Both charge over USB-C.

In summary

The Xiaomi Magnetic Power Bank 10000 with Built-in Stand has a 10,000 mAh battery (vs 5,000 mAh), 33 W output (vs 7.5 W) and 15 W wireless charging (vs 7.5 W). The Anker 622 Magnetic Battery MagGo Upgraded Version 5000mAh has a weight of 140 g (vs 229 g) and a thickness of 12.8 mm (vs 20.25 mm). Both support wireless charging, and both charge over USB-C.

Back to compared products ↑

Related comparisons